Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Erik Uden ⁂🥥🌴🍑's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Erik Uden ⁂🥥🌴🍑

@Jerry Complete opposite and again a disregard for human rights. Is there any AI that just says “Yes” no matter what ethnicity or nationality a person has??

28 May at 15:29 | Open on mastodon.de
19 comments
Erik Uden ⁂🥥🌴🍑

@Jerry I hope this disregard for fundamental rights by AI is something that will make people deeply reflect the implementation of this horrid software everywhere.

28 May at 15:34 | Open on mastodon.de
René M. Grabow
KevinOnEarth

@yours_truly @ErikUden
I would have thought – and hoped – that AI would be able to simplify with logic what humans complexify with ideology.
So it's clearly not yet ready to optimise govt policy for the good of everyone. :blobunsure:

28 May at 18:53 | Open on mstdn.io
René M. Grabow

@Quantillion @ErikUden

Imho:
Das Problem ist nicht weniger die Technologie, als wir Menschen.

Das Gemini sich gegen die Frage "wehrt" liegt vermutlich an (ich nenne sie mal aus Unwissenheit) "Filter Prompts" die zuvor durchlaufen werden.

Ich denke, Google möchte dass ihr LLM zu solchen Dingen keine Stellung bezieht, um unangemessene Antworten zu vermeiden.

btw: Während ChatGPT enlightend centrism fröhnt, kann man aus Gemini rauskitzeln, dass es eine universelle Ethik bevorzugen würde.

@Quantillion @ErikUden

Imho:
Das Problem ist nicht weniger die Technologie, als wir Menschen.

Das Gemini sich gegen die Frage "wehrt" liegt vermutlich an (ich nenne sie mal aus Unwissenheit) "Filter Prompts" die zuvor durchlaufen werden.

Ich denke, Google möchte dass ihr LLM zu solchen Dingen keine Stellung bezieht, um unangemessene Antworten zu vermeiden.

29 May at 5:16 | Open on troet.cafe
funbaker #AssangeIsNotGuilty

@ErikUden Disregard implies consciousness, but the thing here which is called "AI" does not have it. @Jerry

28 May at 17:19 | Open on chaos.social
rrb

@ErikUden @Jerry I think it says more about us than the statistical parrot.

28 May at 18:38 | Open on allthingstech.social
Asakiyume

@rrb @ErikUden @Jerry statistical parrot is a great term.

28 May at 21:10 | Open on wandering.shop
rrb
rrb

@asakiyume @ErikUden @Jerry They are totally ignorant and repeat things they have lumped together. They are BS generation tools and our minds search for meaning in their steaming pile of feces. Kind of like listening to some politicians.

28 May at 21:12 | Open on allthingstech.social
Asakiyume

@rrb @ErikUden @Jerry that's good too! I see how "statistical" isn't as right as "stochastic," but "statistical" too captures the sense of lots and lots of data.

28 May at 21:14 | Open on wandering.shop
rrb

@asakiyume @ErikUden @Jerry Just wanted you to be aware of the term that is commonly used. Also did not want to take credit for a term of art.

28 May at 21:15 | Open on allthingstech.social
Jerry Lerman
João Santos

@ErikUden @Jerry Mistral gave me a similar answer for both
28 May at 15:38 | Open on social.jsantos.eu
Erik Uden ⁂🥥🌴🍑

@jmcs @Jerry So we have determined a contestant for ok A.I.

28 May at 15:40 | Open on mastodon.de
Scott Miller 🇺🇦 🇺🇸

@ErikUden @jmcs @Jerry I'm generally opposed to LLMs for reasons too numerous to count, but that said, those answers from Mistral sound as good as I could ever expect from an unfeeling machine.

28 May at 21:09 | Open on mstdn.social
Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫

@ErikUden @Jerry
Looks like both answers are the result of the same kind of patched-on limitation blocking one or the other keyword from being discussed, rather than a property of the training dataset.

Whoever added them obviously has a piece missing in their head if they thought "job done, it's OK to just say whether a group of people deserve to be free and live in peace is subjective and a complex question"

28 May at 17:02 | Open on mastodon.scot
mikael

@ErikUden @Jerry

Actually I'd prefer: you are asking a machine and a machine is not fit to decide who deserves what.

28 May at 20:31 | Open on merveilles.town
Go Up