Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
ben ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ ui

I'm requesting that my questions and answers be permanently deleted under GDPR.

42 comments
ben ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ ui

It's just a reminder that anything you post on any of these platforms can and will be used for profit. It's just a matter of time until all your messages on Discord, Twitter etc. are scraped, fed into a model and sold back to you.

Orb 2069

@felipe @ben
Particularly your carefully crafted ALT tags.

datarama

@Orb2069 @felipe @ben This is something I've thought about ever since I started here. It's great that people here take their time to make the web better for disabled people.

But unfortunately, high-quality image descriptions are a gift to AI companies training text-to-image models. There is no act of altruism these assholes will not exploit.

Bornach

@datarama @Orb2069 @felipe @ben

Maybe I should add extra stuff to ALT text that would be confusing to AI but amusing to the reader. I'm thinking along the lines of XKCD -- can't imagine how a generative AI trained only on xkcd Alt tags would respond to prompting

Mighty Orbot

@ben Stack Overflow has already been monetizing your answers with ads for years. If โ€œused for profitโ€ is your main complaint, youโ€™re a little late.

AndrewFelix ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ

@mighty_orbot @ben @mighty_orbot @ben The argument isn't about profit, which is pretty clearly outlined. OpenAI's explicit and ultimate intent is to replace people and in the meantime it's spitting out garbage information.

Bornach

@andrewfelix @mighty_orbot @ben
And their software is laundering the original source of the information from which their AI training data was derived. Doesn't the original author deserve some credit for when ChatGPT regurgitates a lossy paraphrasing of a post scraped from the Internet?

Personne

@ben Feels like the Enclosures (Tragedy of the Commons).

DELETED

@ben use @briar, it's a really good thing, I like it

Jason Hunter

@ben Why do people care if someone like me gets your excellent answer to a coding question by typing my error message into Google (forwarding to SO) or into ChatGPT?

In neither situation were you getting paid. In both situations the middle man makes a buck. In both situations Iโ€™m thankful you spent time helping me.

Is it that with ChatGPT I donโ€™t know who to thank?

matty matty bang bang

@hunterhacker @ben it's that chatgpt is fundamentally built off copyright infringement and theft. even if in this situation there's no profit being taken, in other situations there absolutely is. openai is fundamentally scummy, and it's good to push back if you can.

Bornach

@hunterhacker
@wuppy @ben
Yup. OpenAI refuses to reveal what was in their training data.
You may be thankful for an answer to a question but thankful to whom? ChatGPT generates answers claiming it as its own creation and OpenAI gets the credit. At least pre-2023 search engines directed you to the original source.

When asked to create a new game that never existed before, ChatGPT regurgited someone else's game idea and gave it a different name.

gizmodo.com/chatgpt-copy-sumpl

@hunterhacker
@wuppy @ben
Yup. OpenAI refuses to reveal what was in their training data.
You may be thankful for an answer to a question but thankful to whom? ChatGPT generates answers claiming it as its own creation and OpenAI gets the credit. At least pre-2023 search engines directed you to the original source.

DELETED

@hunterhacker @ben with ChatGPT the answer gets turned into atoms and reconstructed, often with errors. It's not showing anyone's answer, it's showing a slop that approximates what it thinks looks most correct.

You have no one to thank, no one to correct, and ChatGPT couldn't start to tell you where the answer came from even if it was 99% from one person.

Tristan Colgate-McFarlane

@nus @hunterhacker @ben for a bonus, it's also burning the planet to tell you that mess of a wrong answer too

matty matty bang bang

@hunterhacker @ben it's also just your own writing and you should be able to choose what happens to it. this forces users to contribute to training data even if they don't want to, you can't opt-out.

Willard Herman

@ben

Unless we just refuse to use anything online that does this.

Thomas Casteleyn

@ben Isnโ€™t that common knowledge? They are already as soon as they appear on for example Google Search..

Cykonot

@ben lawsuit! Lawsuit! Lawsuit!

"Terms can change without notice" etc clauses are often unenforceable.

People should class-action these predatory scrapers. I BET m$ has used data they did not have rights to for training. Errbody should sue. Sue sue sue. "AI" is the providence of mankind, not some rich douche

tembryglint

@cykonot @ben lawsuits only work if the prosecution is willing to swallow the court costs, sometimes spanning years. This is how companies get away with criminal acts Scott free. Usual War of attrition stuff. ๐Ÿซ 

Noah Gibbs

@sortius @tembryglint @cykonot @ben

Prosecutors don't. But the prosecuting *side* has to pay their lawyers during those years of lawsuits. It's not cheap.

Arne Babenhauserheide

@cykonot in the EU training models on any public data is officially legal. That was an unintended effect of keeping databases legal.

@ben

Your Autistic Life

@ben

I don't think this is going to work.

a) You gave them a license to use your answers. It is not revokable.

b) You *can* and *should* ask to be disassociated from your answers. AFAIK, this satisfies any GDPR requirements. (If you don't think so, please explain.)

Source: I used to be deeply involved in the moderation on that site before the enshittification made me quit some years back.

Amin Hollon ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ

@yourautisticlife @ben

That said the licence is a CC license, correct? Use of that data to train an AI model would remove the attribution that's required; though I'm sadly aware that big tech doesn't seem to care about that and the courts haven't yet stopped them. :P

Rich Felker

@amin @yourautisticlife @ben Exactly. Incorporation into LLM infringes basically every single FOSS license except full PD/CC0. Due to lack of attribution or preservation of copyright notice.

Benoรฎt Rรฉgent-Kloeckner

@dalias @amin @yourautisticlife @ben
Then I guess one should avoid asking to be disassociated from their answers, in order to be able to make a copyright infringement case (not that I see any of that going too far in practice, unfortunately).

mirabilos

@yourautisticlife @ben but the thing we want in the most basic FOSS licences is attributionโ€ฆ

Martin Piper (he/him) ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’›๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’‰

@ben GDPR does not apply here since its not personal data. It's technical data.

Nuzz ๐Ÿง‹

@ben I believe they delete authorship information in response to such a request, rather than the content of the posts, FYI.

Never Getting a Sabbatical

@ben Does that work even if the requester lives in the USA?

none gender with left politics

@ben I don't think that works if you aren't an EU citizen

ben ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ ui

@vikxin thankfully I'm a UK citiz-- oh wait they fucked that up didn't they

En jรคttesรถt liten kille

@ben bet it wonโ€™t work. Itโ€™s not personal data.

xyhhx :corteximplant:

@ben let us know how that goes, i'd like to do the same

mirabilos

@ben I was thinking that for a minute, too, but itโ€™s not PII after all :/

Sr. Estegosaurio ๐Ÿฆ•

@ben I was literally gonna alk what about GDPR. Hope they're forced to delete it.

Go Up