Gregory's Server@baldur "that aren’t generated themselves": what do you want to say? Art is always generated by one or some artists. This means that a human (or even an animal) has painted, photographed, drawn, glued it etc.
And it sounds perhaps crazy but human artists exist who work with generative AI.
|
Top-level
 8 comments
 @NatureMC You seem to have decided to reply in a confrontational manner to a post where I put in effort not to be confrontational. If you intended this to be a constructive reply, then you probably should have phrased it differently Like I said, people are more and more dismissing links out of hand because they spot that the preview thumbnail is a generated image Using a generated image to illustrate writing that isn't generated gives people on social media the false impression that it's spam @baldur Sorry, that's probably because English is a foreign language for me. I didn't want to be confrontational, but I wanted to ask what exactly you mean by this expression for the sake of my understanding. @baldur I only tried to explain this in my post to explain my question. Again sorry for my bad English. @NatureMC So, in colloquial English, “generated art” is usually taken to mean the same thing as “generative art”. That is, something algorithmically generated, which today largely means something created using a statistical generative model such as a diffusion model or GAN. It’s a superset that includes both “AI” generated art and that created by simpler algorithms, although the simpler generated art doesn’t have the same negative connotations among audiences @baldur Thank you for explaining your post. This is exactly what I wanted to know. |
@NatureMC @baldur I think he means that the text of the blog posts is also AI generated.