Gregory's Server@karabaic Conceivably yes, the user could be liable for recording someone without consent in a multi-person consent state. But Limitless would likely be no more liable than Sony would be for making a tape recorder used to record someone without their consent in the same situation.
@stg That makes sense for a generic recorder used in a place with no expectation of privacy with other uses, like recording music.
This is specifically designed to record human interactions and has a consent setting turned off by default.
Is there a colorable argument that the service provider knows the product has consent issues?
I'm thinking something like the product liability lawsuits against gun manufacturers who marketed guns for particular uses?