Gregory's Server@rysiek I use Kagi, it's paid (so no ads or user tracking needed). It has optional AI, but it's based on sources (and it will mention those, like Wikipedia does).
|
3 comments
@eishiya Fair point 😅 Personally I see a big difference between the common AI which just makes everything up, and an AI which combines sources (and posts them after each sentence). For me, the results are way better than DDG (or Google) luckily, but that will of course be different per person. I personally use the summarizer mostly for clickbait youtube videos where the title is "We have to talk". 🤣  @thomastospace To me, clickbait articles/videos are a waste of my time even in summary form, so the only AI application I'd want for them is something that can filter them out entirely. But I don't think one needs AI for that :D |
@thomastospace DDG's "AI" thing is also optional. So if OP wants to stop using DDG because of it, why would they want to move to Kagi, which also has "AI" integration? xP
I tried Kagi a while back and was considering getting a subscription even though the search results were no better for my needs than DDG's, but then they announced their summariser and I stuck with DDG. Guess that didn't last long 🤣