It is sad to me that in 2024 if I search "Moby-Dick by Herman Melville" (no quotes) on Google, the free Project Gutenberg ebook isn't even in the top ten results
It is sad to me that in 2024 if I search "Moby-Dick by Herman Melville" (no quotes) on Google, the free Project Gutenberg ebook isn't even in the top ten results 26 comments
We launched Google Ads in 2000 in an effort to make a lot of money. While the product has a loyal following among Senior Vice Presidents, over the years we've made enough money. So, on July 1, 2025 we will sunset Google Ads. @jessamyn yeah it was right under the fold for me. Really glad they surfaced a $215,000 rare edition in the top 5, very useful @darius I like to think one of the benefits of being a billionaire is you can tell Google just what search results you want and it listens. #LateStageCapitalism @darius @anildash these days for old books i tend to go first to Standard EBooks https://standardebooks.org (and yes, Moby Dick is there ๐ณ) @darius two ads, a wikipedia summary, a couple more sites and then Gutenberg. IDK why anyone still uses google search in this decade https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Moby-Dick+by+Herman+Melville&ia=web @enobacon I mean if you add full text on Google it's number one, no ads at all. I've used Google and DDG and both really suck and it pains me @darius Iโm going to use my mid-2000s (the decade) SEO knowledge and do something about that! @darius I learned the "before:" trick yesterday, If you search with "before:2020" for example it removes some of the SEO fuckery. Works if you're looking for more internet historical things and know roughly the date you're after. @darius On Google after Wikipedia I get online booksellers, for the next thirty-forty results at least. On ddg Gutenberg is in the top ten, after some different language Wikipedia entries. @darius also irksome: the difficulty in finding non-ecom-site review-posts for a book. (I prefer blog posts or MSM reviews over stream-posts to GoodReads, Amazon, etc) @darius It's at #3, after Wikipedia and Britannica, which seems reasonable. |
@darius On DuckDuck it's beneath a stack of summaries aimed at middleschoolers cheating on their homework. ๐