Gregory's ServerPresentation will be about cybersecurity related to passenger rail transportation, prepared by a 3rd party
|
40 comments
Newag rep trying to make a point along the lines of "we don't have to do shit" (regarding best practices and transparency requirements) MP Matysiak burning them again: Well only your trains break so like what the fuck? Sure you don't have to do many things but perhaps you should in this case? lmao > "So like: do you even provide any changelogs of information that train software was altered?" > "UHHH CAN'T ANSWER BECAUSE OF ONGOING INVESTIGATION" kekw Masovian Railways: Well, after Newag maintenance, software release versions don't match manufacturing date, so they changed it and we had no information about this @rail_ I'm having a lot of fun watching this without even understanding a single word (sadly) 😅  @rail_@bark.lgbt "we fixed it, right? so you don't have to question why it's broken anymore, it totally won't happen ever again and if it does you can just pay us to fix it again" @rail_@bark.lgbt but safety! you need to protect the passengers from the train-destroying bad vibes coming from the nearby workshop, they should just close, then there'd be no issue /s  @MagicLike geofencing was mentioned only once re: "can you verify or detect unauthorized software changes? because there are rumors it was someone ELSE who added them" @MagicLike it couldn't be them ofc, the only entity that has access to the actual source code :fox_laugh: |
Lmao so far he is talking about stuff that is very much unrelated to the issue
Including new planned railway infrastructure project