Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
1,552 posts total
Johannes Ernst

In light of @TexasObserver 's shutdown, I keep thinking independent #journalism has a similar funding problem as the #fediverse. It's fundamentally a "commons" activity and hard to monetize directly. If you do, you get ads, and paywalls and clickbait and all of that.

Whatever the ultimate solution, perhaps both funding mechanisms turn out to be the same?

Bob Wyman

@J12t @TexasObserver Even as newspapers are shutting down, the newsletter business appears to be growing, many organizations sponsor paid-entry speaker series, YouTube videos are making advertising money, etc.

"Journalism" != "Newspapers."

It seems to me that rather than shutting down, some of these newspapers should consider reformulating themselves as centers for a broader range of profitable journalism-related activities.

@jeffjarvis @jayrosen_nyu

Johannes Ernst

Have to agree with those arguing that plug-ins for #chatgpt (an “App Store” for it) are a big deal.

Johannes Ernst

VerifiedJournalist.org -- a rather interesting project that verifies journalists in the Fediverse. There's a ton of them already! Who knew so many journalists are here!

/cc @jeff

Aswath Rao

@J12t
Interesting qs: 1. Do they charge a fee? 2. Do they provide a profile page which Mastodon can verify? Kind of redirected verification :-)
@jeff

Johannes Ernst

@flaki@flak.is wants to talk about "Ownership of one's own data. Customization, user interfaces & ux of social feed consumption. Small communities. Reducing friction to self-hosting and small instances" at #FediForum

There are so many interesting, and important subjects, like these, we could easily fill an entire week with interesting #FediForum sessions!

James M.

@J12t regarding customization of UX:

IMO the right way to do it is to use templates (HTML or XML or whatever) to fully separate the design from the coding. So a UX theme/skin is comprised of a set of templates, a CSS file, and any graphics used by the theme. That way, third-party designers can create and share their own themes with other users, without having to code JS etc. Perhaps an individual user could also edit whichever theme they use. These themes could be far more diverse than just colors and styling; they could implement entirely different layouts and UX.

Note that third-party themes would absolutely need to be checked for security-- disallow embedded JS, links to external sites, etc. But that wouldn't be hard to automate.

@J12t regarding customization of UX:

IMO the right way to do it is to use templates (HTML or XML or whatever) to fully separate the design from the coding. So a UX theme/skin is comprised of a set of templates, a CSS file, and any graphics used by the theme. That way, third-party designers can create and share their own themes with other users, without having to code JS etc. Perhaps an individual user could also edit whichever theme they use. These themes could be far more diverse than just colors...

Johannes Ernst

E-commerce has been around for about 25 years. For anybody selling a consumer product, referring customers to "one of our partners" to get replacement parts -- none of whom have a way to buy parts on-line -- is simply not acceptable.

Johannes Ernst

The sun is shining, the birds are singing, and the neighbor is hammering something in his backyard. It must be spring.

Kat M. Moss

@J12t LOL.Those first two are awesome. I could do without the hammer, though.

Johannes Ernst

If you are an implementor of #ActivityPub, or any related social web apps or protocols, please try to come to the meeting on the future of ActivityPub standardization and related subjects next Wednesday, March 29. It's on-line and hosted by #FediForum and the W3C's Social Web Interest Community Group.

We want to hear from you! Standards should not be created in a vacuum. If you have tried to use ActivityPub (successfully or not!), tell us what you need! And perhaps get involved making it so.

Go Up