Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
5 posts total
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)

I received a request from @ghost today to add #LDSignatures to @fedify for compatibility with #Mastodon, as Mastodon does not plan to implement Object Integrity Proofs (FEP-8b32) for the near future. 😩

However, Mastodon's implementation of LD Signatures does not even use valid JSON-LD properties (despite the name), so I'm not sure how to make it compatible with Mastodon since #Fedify does JSON-LD processing. 🤔

#ActivityPub #fedidev

Show previous comments
Clairement crevée

@hongminhee @ghost @fedify these properties should be part of the https://w3id.org/security/v1 context, but it looks like we are omitting this context in some activities

Григорий Клюшников

Smithereen (I'm writing this from it) also does JSON-LD processing but also supports LD signatures. I don't understand what's the problem here — imo you aren't supposed to LD-process the signature itself. I remove it before any LD processing and treat it as a separate object passed alongside the main one.

silverpill

@hongminhee Do they want LD signatures in Fedify in order to process forwarded Create activities? I simply fetch object by its id when signer and actor do not match.

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)

Wow, English-only people (or Western languages, for that matter) are so naïve. In case you didn't know, the lang attribute is very important in East Asian languages.

lobste.rs/s/9ck6y9/what_progra

jsfiddle.net/8sa8ndLj/2/

#CJK #language #EastAsian

Show previous comments
Melody :cat_inside:

@hongminhee@fosstodon.org anything that improves accessibility, be it for disabled or people of different language, should not be a suggestion but mandatory

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)

I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:

• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.

Even if I were to build Fedify again, I would choose TypeScript.

#fedidev #CSharp #dotnet #JavaScript

I've rewritten #Fedify several times and in several languages. The first time it was written in #TypeScript, then #Python, then C#, then back to TypeScript. (It was codenamed FediKit at the time of development.) I settled on TypeScript for the following reasons:

• It has a decent JSON-LD implementation.
• Lots of people use it. (I wanted Fedify to be widely used.)
• It's type-safe enough.

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)

I'm sharing a prototype of #Fedify written in #Python, codenamed “FediKit.” Many of the ideas for Fedify were already implemented in this prototype, albeit in a different language.

github.com/dahlia/fedikit

Go Up