- unencrypted faang client - other unencrypted faang client - other other unencrypted faang client - encrypted faang client that is likely backdoored - $20 profile microtransactions and constantly changing UX - client with optional encryption and requires a phone number - encrypted by default client that also requires a phone number - 35 year old protocol lacking a lot of QOL features that people still use for some reason - 25 year old protocol that nobody can agree on which extensions to use - "unable to decrypt message"
come chat with us online, your options are:
- unencrypted faang client - other unencrypted faang client - other other unencrypted faang client - encrypted faang client that is likely backdoored - $20 profile microtransactions and constantly changing UX - client with optional encryption and requires a phone number - encrypted by default client that also requires a phone number - 35 year old protocol lacking a lot of QOL features that people still use for some reason - 25 year old protocol that nobody can...
@Jenetrix 25 year old and unable to decrypt message are my preferred ones, should've mentioned that most of those are centralised too, which makes them worse