solo's wall

solo's posts Back to profile

1 post total

solo

STOP DOING AGILE
- SOFTWARE WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE SISYPHEAN
- YEARS OF PROGRAMS yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for a DAILY STANDUP
- Wanted to add features anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called "WATERFALL"
- "Yes please give me UNFINISHED software. Please let me work INFINITY hours" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the keyboards & mice we built for them
(This is REAL Programming, done by REAL Programmers):

[diagram explaining agile in the shape of an infinity]
?????

[diagram explaining the agile lifecycle in a circle, with several popup text boxes]
???????

[diagram explaining the scrum process]
?????????????????
"Hello I would like [picture of the ouroboros symbol, aka a dragon/serpent eating its own tail] features please"
They have played us for absolute fools

STOP DOING SEMANTIC HTML
- SEMANTICS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE AMBIGUOUS
- YEARS OF TAGGING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for main/nav/section/figure other than as a CSS SELECTOR
- Wanted semantic markup anyway for a brag? We had a tool for that: It was called "MICROFORMATS"
- "Yes please code using these tags with INDECIPHERABLE meaning that everybody uses WRONG so some dev out there may POTENTIALLY build a product based on them being used RIGHT." - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Semanticists have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the hypertext & web browsers we built them
(This is REAL Semantics, done by REAL Semanticists):

<i>:The ldiomatic Text element
The <i> HTML element represents a range of text that is set off from the normal text for some reason,
?????


<p>According to <cite>the Wikipedia article on HTML</cite>, as it stood in mid-February 2008, leaving attribute values unquoted is unsafe. This is obviously an over-simplification.</p>
???????

- Do not confuse the <b> element with the <strong>, <em>, OF <mark> elements. The <strong> element represents text of certain importance, <em> puts some emphasis on the text and the <mark> element represents text of certain relevance. The <b> element doesn't convey such special semantic information; use it only when no others fit
?????????????????

[alt text continued in reply due to lack of characters]

Like 17 December at 5:55 | Open on tech.lgbt

solo

continued alt text for 4th image:

"Hello | would like [icon for making text bold] [icon for making text italic] to stop outputting <b>/<i> and become <strong>/<em> because that's more semantic"
They have played us for absolute fools

17 December at 5:55 | Open on tech.lgbt