solo

This profile might be incomplete.
Open on tech.lgbt

Followers
Follows

solo

pronouns:

any (no preference; use whatever you want)

Contact info

Website:

https://solonovamax.gay

Personal info

About:

Just some nerd who does code sometimes.

I follow cute people/creatures

not worth it.

all my socials are on my website (discord, matrix, etc.)

Wall 1 post

solo

STOP DOING SEMANTIC HTML
- SEMANTICS AREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE AMBIGUOUS
- YEARS OF TAGGING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for main/nav/section/figure other than as a CSS SELECTOR
- Wanted semantic markup anyway for a brag? We had a tool for that: It was called "MICROFORMATS"
- "Yes please code using these tags with INDECIPHERABLE meaning that everybody uses WRONG so some dev out there may POTENTIALLY build a product based on them being used RIGHT." - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Semanticists have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the hypertext & web browsers we built them
(This is REAL Semantics, done by REAL Semanticists):

<i>:The ldiomatic Text element
The <i> HTML element represents a range of text that is set off from the normal text for some reason,
?????

<!-- do not copy this example, it is an example of bad usage! -->
<p>According to <cite>the Wikipedia article on HTML</cite>, as it stood in mid-February 2008, leaving attribute values unquoted is unsafe. This is obviously an over-simplification.</p>
???????

- Do not confuse the <b> element with the <strong>, <em>, OF <mark> elements. The <strong> element represents text of certain importance, <em> puts some emphasis on the text and the <mark> element represents text of certain relevance. The <b> element doesn't convey such special semantic information; use it only when no others fit
?????????????????

[alt text continued in reply due to lack of characters]

Like 17 December at 5:55 | Open on tech.lgbt

solo

continued alt text for 4th image:

"Hello | would like [icon for making text bold] [icon for making text italic] to stop outputting <b>/<i> and become <strong>/<em> because that's more semantic"
They have played us for absolute fools

17 December at 5:55 | Open on tech.lgbt

Show 1 reply

Go Up