11 posts total
Deep from my archives, I have finally recovered the most legendary meme on Fedi (IMO, since most people here nowadays probably haven't seen it)
Show previous comments
Theory: is #Emacs being “good enough” why no #Lisp has a fantastically integrated development environment (including GUI toolkit) like every extant Smalltalk implementation has? Because as far as I can tell, Lisp machines *did* have a Smalltalk-like environment, but since Emacs existed nobody bothered to try implementing an equivalently featureful environment after Lisp machines stopped being a thing
Show previous comments
@nytpu There are a few efforts that trying to get a similar environment within Common Lisp: https://codeberg.org/mmontone/mold-desktop/ and https://project-mage.org/ @nytpu That may be part of it, but I think another issue here is that Lisp has never been monolithic like Smalltalk, and the Lisp standard (at least CL) has no GUI toolkit primitives. @nytpu yes — and maybe that’s because Emacs is a fantastically integrated development environment including cross-platform GUI toolkit that even works on the terminal … Also Dr. Racket. I love the Fortran website made in the style of modern programming language websites: https://fortran-lang.org/ Especially since like 70% of the selling points are accurate and yet identical to the ones on the rust website
Show previous comments
I understand why my father was doing research with FORTRAN: > Natively parallel /me mouth open, eyes blinking I really dislike the trend of modern programming languages to get more and more special-character-heavy and have dozens of unintelligible modifier symbols. Give me Ada with like five punctuation marks, or any Lisp with everything nice and regular. Ada attributes and aspects are basically equivalent to those modifiers except they actually tell you what the fuck they do instead of being randomly selected APL symbols. Remembering the time the GNU list of “free software code forges” refused to list Sourcehut because they say “Linux” instead of “GNU/Linux” in a few spots on the site, even though the “Linux” Sourcehut was referring to was Alpine Linux—i.e. objectively not GNU/Linux. > refused to list sourcehut Then what's this on the 2nd line: https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html |
@nytpu juan.
@nytpu *sings* In espaniaaaaaaa? Mille e tre!
@nytpu@tilde.zone .nauj