@briankrebs btw, as I've mentioned I think the dynamic nature of the new web is the reason Google has given up on caching.
A cache would only contain an image of the page given to the robot.
It would increasingly *not* look like what we see when we visit the same place.
@John That's interesting. But even a static image can be very useful, esp. if the alternative if you don't get to see anything at all.
I think this is probably the correct explanation for why this feature is being killed, from the Verge story I cited above:
"Although the cache links are only now being discontinued, the writing’s been on the wall for a while. In early 2021, Google developer relations engineer Martin Splitt said the cached view was a “basically unmaintained legacy feature.”
https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/2/24058985/google-search-cache-feature-discontinued
@John That's interesting. But even a static image can be very useful, esp. if the alternative if you don't get to see anything at all.
I think this is probably the correct explanation for why this feature is being killed, from the Verge story I cited above:
"Although the cache links are only now being discontinued, the writing’s been on the wall for a while. In early 2021, Google developer relations engineer Martin Splitt said the cached view was a “basically unmaintained legacy feature.”