Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
John Socks

@briankrebs btw, as I've mentioned I think the dynamic nature of the new web is the reason Google has given up on caching.

A cache would only contain an image of the page given to the robot.

It would increasingly *not* look like what we see when we visit the same place.

4 comments
BrianKrebs

@John That's interesting. But even a static image can be very useful, esp. if the alternative if you don't get to see anything at all.

I think this is probably the correct explanation for why this feature is being killed, from the Verge story I cited above:

"Although the cache links are only now being discontinued, the writing’s been on the wall for a while. In early 2021, Google developer relations engineer Martin Splitt said the cached view was a “basically unmaintained legacy feature.”

theverge.com/2024/2/2/24058985

@John That's interesting. But even a static image can be very useful, esp. if the alternative if you don't get to see anything at all.

I think this is probably the correct explanation for why this feature is being killed, from the Verge story I cited above:

"Although the cache links are only now being discontinued, the writing’s been on the wall for a while. In early 2021, Google developer relations engineer Martin Splitt said the cached view was a “basically unmaintained legacy feature.”

Nicole Parsons

@briankrebs @John

Google's strategy changed when Mohammed bin Salman invested in tech starting in 2018.

The fossil fuel industry recognizes to keep its wealth, it needs to thwart democracies from enacting penalties for frying the planet.

Funding Trump and anti-democracy billionaires' #enshittification is how.
cnbc.com/2018/04/07/heres-a-lo

MooMoo the Cat

@Npars01 @briankrebs @John I did not realize he was a big investor, but it makes sense. This visit (April 2018) was just a few months prior to Jamal Khashoggi being killed (October 2018).

SlightlyCyberpunk

@John @briankrebs That dynamic nature is exactly why they should retain the cache. There are SO MANY times where I search for something, click a promising result, and find none of my search terms are present on the page...so I go back, grab a snippet of the summary from the result, do a CTRL-F on that, and still find nothing!

If the search result is the homepage of a news site for example I clearly don't want to see the new current headlines, I want to see the headlines from whatever day the page was indexed where it actually matched my search query!

@John @briankrebs That dynamic nature is exactly why they should retain the cache. There are SO MANY times where I search for something, click a promising result, and find none of my search terms are present on the page...so I go back, grab a snippet of the summary from the result, do a CTRL-F on that, and still find nothing!

Go Up