Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
matdevdug

The thing about that people who haven’t been through it often don’t understand is that morale never recovers. The employees who remain will never have the same relationship with that company, bosses or peers.

Watching people you respect pack their stuff and crying on the phone with their spouses is something that never goes away. When I survived a layoff in my 20s I became a “do exactly what the ticket says” person. I stopped suggesting ideas, providing feedback, believing anything a manager told me.

If you are a company considering layoffs, especially a profitable company, you should approach it as “this department will have 100% turnover”. The second I got another job offer I left that company and six months later nobody who had been there at the time of layoffs remained.

I’ve seen that pattern play out multiple times.

139 comments
Dan Jacob

@matdevdug I think this time round these companies are counting on all their peers doing layoffs at the same time, so the survivors will have no choice but to stay on. So you avoid the "Dead Sea Effect".

Kevin Lyda

@danjac @matdevdug lots of companies out there need tech staff.

EmberQuill :v_gf:

@danjac @matdevdug the one thing they don't seem to consider is that tech employees don't need to work in the tech sector unless they have a pathological need to always be on the absolute bleeding edge of tech.

All the tech layoffs missed me entirely because I work for an insurance company that mostly isn't affected by short-term tech trends. I know several people with similar job responsibilities to mine (cloud infrastructure, automation, and security) who work for every industry from defense contractors to pet food to nonprofit charities.

@danjac @matdevdug the one thing they don't seem to consider is that tech employees don't need to work in the tech sector unless they have a pathological need to always be on the absolute bleeding edge of tech.

All the tech layoffs missed me entirely because I work for an insurance company that mostly isn't affected by short-term tech trends. I know several people with similar job responsibilities to mine (cloud infrastructure, automation, and security) who work for every industry from defense contractors...

Eamon

@emberquill @danjac @matdevdug I would love to see data on how many "tech workers" work at "tech companies" (however you want to define those terms).

tessarakt

@danjac @matdevdug So they implement coordinated behaviors? Isn't that against anti-trust laws?

Jess👾

@tessarakt @danjac @matdevdug
Oh you sweet summer child...

They've always been colluding. They're just clever enough to not get caught most of the time.

Dan Jacob

@JessTheUnstill @tessarakt @matdevdug Adam Smith: "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”

Animal Spirits

@danjac @matdevdug All that gets these companies is people doing just enough to stay on until the economy improves.

Dan Jacob

@animalspirits @matdevdug if the economy approves, at least in the tech sector. I am not confident it will, at least within the lifespan of our careers.

Animal Spirits

@danjac @matdevdug

I've been in tech since right after y2k and seen this cycle a few times. The industry and the tech changes, but demand has always rebounded for one reason or another. First it was putting PCs on everyone's desk, then y2k, then internet enabled tools, then virtualization, then cloud.

Of course nothing has to continue the way it always has but I don't see any evidence it's going to stop. Even using AI makes me think it's going to make more jobs than it kills.

Dan Jacob

@animalspirits @matdevdug I have been in tech as long. It's a category error to think this is just another downturn.

Animal Spirits

@danjac @matdevdug

People said the same thing when all the other downturns happened.

What makes this one different?

dumb future

@matdevdug Well said. If there is one small upside of these layoffs, hopefully it will help dispel the Silicon Valley mythology that these companies often traffic in.

Free lunch and a foozeball table is a poor substitute for job security and human-focused management.

Garrett Wollman

@ourdumbfuture @matdevdug I have never not been glad that I stayed in academia and turned down opportunities to work at tech companies that don't exist any more.

12foxfire

@matdevdug I got out before this happened. Actually, the whole company was bought out. I should never have been in corporate America.

Steven Hoefer

@matdevdug I wonder if some of these companies aren't counting on AI to stand in for the institutional knowledge lost.

Though it seems like the value of institutional knowledge has been lost after several generations over turnover. To these companies all tech workers are fungible bootcamp graduates.

It's excruciating to see.

Martha Howell

@troublewithwords @matdevdug
After a few rounds of layoffs, plus others leaving for better opportunities, the new leadership and the 20-somes they hired made it clear that professing institutional knowledge was a professional liability that indicated you were inflexible and stuck in time. So, we experienced the same lessons again.

Steven Hoefer

@MHowell @matdevdug I wish I could disagree, but my partner had been working on a project for 15 years, the next senior person had 3. The software existed in order to comply with federal regulations. She was the only one who had even read the regulations. Development was so compartmentalized that junior devs literally (literally) didn't know what the software did.

Anyway, she was recently fired because pointing out all the regulations they were violating was considered bad for morale.

Martha Howell

@troublewithwords @matdevdug
I was told that senior management was trashing me behind the scenes because I was finding and reporting too many bugs in our new e-commerce system. So, I stopped reporting them, let the customers find them, and took a package when it was offered. I heard that the new, multi-million dollar system was trashed as unfixable within two years.

MissConstrue

@troublewithwords @MHowell @matdevdug Been there! Reported them to various government and criminal prosecutors. Three initial agencies have very little sense of humor when it comes to regulations.

Ana Hevesi

@matdevdug My gut has been telling me that companies are fooling themselves into thinking 100% turnover is fine, actually, because workers can just be replaced now that so many are on the market, and institutional knowledge didn’t matter that much in the first place (lol).

Sound right?

ferricoxide

@matdevdug@c.im

Yeah... It's the whole, "we're destroying your ability to house and feed yourself because speculators won't be happy enough with 'merely profitable'," thing that's especially corrosive.

🌮 Dave Millar 🌮

@matdevdug huge mood. If I hadn’t painted myself into a corner with old tech that isn’t used anywhere else, I’d probably have bounced from where I’m at right now. We’re down from a team of 23 to a team of 2 and I get mad every time people joke about job-related PTSD because I’m actually living with that. Lately I find myself weighing the pros and cons of spending time learning new tech to catch up to the world vs just shuffling off the mortal coil.

Roger

@matdevdug the first time I went through a I really struggled with “what did _I_ do wrong?” It took me a long time to recover from that.

My first time as a manager having to lay people off was one of the toughest days of my 35 yr career. A year after that there was 100% turnover in that team, including me.

My current place has had a round of layoffs. We learned to manage employee growth in a way that we haven’t had to do it again. We’re now profitable and have an amazing team.

Thomas Sturm

@matdevdug @dave Went through the dot-com blowup of 2001 and the banking fuckup of 2008 and various other layoffs. Every time, the remaining people spent months mostly with polishing their resumes.

I’ve never seen any upside, since frequently promising projects or client relationships died in those layoffs, certainly eating up any conceivable savings from the lower payroll.

One Suit Samus

@tsturm @matdevdug @dave
"It’s so... basic," said Gilt. "You make money as it runs down, you make money building it up again, you might even make a little money running it, then you sell it to yourself when it collapses." --Terry Pratchett, *Going Postal*

The goal isn't to run a sustainable business, it's to obtain capital investment and move it around.

Tucker Carlson's Nuts

@matdevdug
🥥 The only positive development Eye can see from this latest wave of tech industry mass layoffs would be if some companies wise up to the fact that firing one grossly overpaid CEO or C-suite would have an actual positive impact
on a company without all the negative impacts of worker layoffs. 🥥

Alexander The 1st

@jstatepost @matdevdug It's possible Microsoft will see that in the new future with their Activision-Blizzard acquisition, and realizing they really could just drop Kotick and have kept everyone else.

Bynkii (they/them)

@matdevdug 30 years in tech but never worked for a tech company. The last five or so years have helped me see it as a form of blessing.

Andrastaxx 💚💜🌼🌎🇦🇽

@matdevdug When I worked as a Nurse in care homes, the key indicator of poor management and low staff morale was turnover rate of staff...this was well-known amongst all my colleagues and it was plain to see whilst I worked at some such establishments. I'm sure this is a phenomenon that exists throughout industry.

Suzka

@matdevdug @femme_mal When I was laid off from a tech co. in 2013 it altered my world view. I had won an award for performance only 2 months earlier! I’ve never trusted an organization to have my back again.

Femme Malheureuse

@suzka @matdevdug No profitable company should layoff personnel. Unprofitable companies should do so only after all other cost cutting measures and efficiencies have been attempted and proven ineffective.

Layoffs cost money because they're demoralizing and reduce productivity. They cost more money to implement which doesn't yield more product/service.

Hiring new people in the future also costs $$$; Fortune 100 co I worked for calculated cost of recruit/hire/onboarding at +$50K/new hire.

John Timaeus

@femme_mal @suzka @matdevdug

I did an analysis in the early 2000s of cost to hire in telecom, including recruiting, onboarding, training & lower productivity during the first year compared to an 'old hire'. It varied by position but it ranged from 40-80% of total compensation.

That's excluding the cost of the inevitable occasional bad hire, which adds another 50-100%.
At the height of the .com boom, I saw some companies with a bad hire rate >25%.

Femme Malheureuse

@johntimaeus @suzka @matdevdug that $50K was an average figure for US hires for a Fortune 100 transnational manufacturing firm about year 2000. It hasn't changed much because of cost savings in process improvement and in stagnant wages at bottom of employment ladder.

In other words that last bit of cost savings came from increased precarity forced on prospective new hires. Likely a 'benefit' of corporations lobbying legislators to keep minimum wage low.

KaisoArt

@matdevdug
It's the case with all layoffs. Not just your industry. It's Capitalism. If you believe in capitalism, you should cheer layoffs, if not, recognize that you are a worker and make solidarity with other workers. From white collar compatriots farm laborers.

Stumpy The Mutt

@matdevdug I have been laid off, survived layoffs, found another job only to go through another round of layoffs. This behavior is endemic to how business is done in the U.S. at least.

Strange Culprits

@matdevdug
This is a difficult subject for many people who don't work in tech. On the one hand, it's awful that skilled tech workers are treated like so many interchangeable cogs by their executive overlords. But on the other hand, these same workers are beneficiaries of a rapacious, profit extraction machine that is literally undermining civil society: none of the tech workers are complaining before the layoff rounds, when bonuses and stock options are plentiful. These same workers take their outsized income and drive up property and commodity prices to the point of harming their own communities and society at large.

We want to support working people. But please, tech workers, be honest with yourselves about the underbelly of the tech economy: instead of feeding at the trough until the bosses cast you aside, how about more of you save up your bonuses to start your own small businesses, to contribute to your community?
@jstatepost

@matdevdug
This is a difficult subject for many people who don't work in tech. On the one hand, it's awful that skilled tech workers are treated like so many interchangeable cogs by their executive overlords. But on the other hand, these same workers are beneficiaries of a rapacious, profit extraction machine that is literally undermining civil society: none of the tech workers are complaining before the layoff rounds, when bonuses and stock options are plentiful. These same workers take their outsized...

Darwin Woodka

@strangeculprits @matdevdug @jstatepost you know when you blame the workers and not the system that's not really solidarity, right?

Tech workers are well paid in part to keep therm from unionizing.

Strange Culprits

@darwinwoodka
Please don't put words in our mouths, we don't blame tech workers for working in tech. However, what those workers do (and *don't* do) with their pay has undeniable consequences for their own communities and society. Two things can be true. BTW, we 100% agree with the notion of unionizing for tech workers, and/or tech worker owned co-ops that can bargain for more stable and secure situations with the FAANG behemoths.
@matdevdug @jstatepost

Magnus Ahltorp

@darwinwoodka @strangeculprits @matdevdug @jstatepost If no employees can ever be blamed, regardless of behaviour or agreement with the compensation structure, then neither can bosses. Not even the CEO. Reproduction of a system is hard to free oneself from, but the more privilege you have, the more leverage you have. Unfortunately also less incentive, because you have more to lose.

Strange Culprits

@ahltorp @darwinwoodka @matdevdug @jstatepost ^This. When some people benefit financially from a manifestly unjust system (and we contend that the current tech economy is precisely that), and then commit none of those disproportionate benefits to help offset the harms wrought by that system, please don't ask for our sympathy when that same system does to you what it's always done to the rest of us.

That's not "blaming workers," it's calling out collaborators.

Donald Ball

@strangeculprits @matdevdug @jstatepost I would take more care with categorical claims about groups of people than you have there. “none of the tech workers”. Okay. You’re a real careful and nuanced thinker. /s

Strange Culprits

@donaldball@triangletoot.party

*Edit: Thank you for reminding us the Mute and Block buttons are out friends

Okay, *you* take more care. We speak from our own first hand experience as tech field survivors/refugees, who got out before getting ground to dust.

If you care to respond, please share how *you* took the profit extraction machine money and put it to better use outside the tech sector.

We did: cashed out options before it was cool, put the $ into a law degree, and have been serving our community ever since
@matdevdug @jstatepost

@donaldball@triangletoot.party

*Edit: Thank you for reminding us the Mute and Block buttons are out friends

Okay, *you* take more care. We speak from our own first hand experience as tech field survivors/refugees, who got out before getting ground to dust.

If you care to respond, please share how *you* took the profit extraction machine money and put it to better use outside the tech sector.

Donald Ball

@strangeculprits I’m not the one making overbroad claims, bud.

A Slightly Orange Cat

@matdevdug I worked at an office that abruptly let go one of its more talented workers. I could hear her sobbing as she packed up her belongings.

Later, as I started to get enough freelance income to leave, I left that job without the customary two weeks notice.

ryan onstott

@matdevdug tech managers almost willfully sabotage company morale -- in the long term it builds a tech culture that is horrible

Pēteris Krišjānis

@matdevdug yeah, because these cuts are always executed by people who are not paid to do the right thing - they are paid to make books look good. They might even doing very well knowing they are destroying any future company might have. But this self sabotage is absurdly encouraged and paid off by coffers of the dying company.

StarsOfTheNight ⒶⒺ

@matdevdug got through one last year and basically my manager who i deeply respected and who was one of the key points that kept me there got fired.

We had profits. So many people got fired cause the profits werent high enough.
None of he executives did resign or anything alike, even though the profit loss was baiscally their fault as they decided to overhire during covid times.
I went from "putting a lot of Energy and resources into this job" to absolutely hating it and burning out within a few months.

And bottom line decided to never ever work in this industry again.

@matdevdug got through one last year and basically my manager who i deeply respected and who was one of the key points that kept me there got fired.

We had profits. So many people got fired cause the profits werent high enough.
None of he executives did resign or anything alike, even though the profit loss was baiscally their fault as they decided to overhire during covid times.
I went from "putting a lot of Energy and resources into this job" to absolutely hating it and burning out within a few months.

Stephanie Moore

@matdevdug As a GenXer, I remember as a child watching friends disappear overnight because of mass layoffs in the 80s. Houses suddenly vacant, abandoned. My dad was never laid off, but the effect you describe is exactly what he came home with. GenX supposedly learned to never trust companies for anything (not sure if we really did in the long run).

Tressie McMillan Cottom reminds that the institution does not love you back. Every bit as true for corporate orgs as for higher ed.

Mandy May

@StephanieMoore
I remember mass forced transfers by the oil and gas industry, from New Orleans to Houston. It felt like the city disgorged a third of its professionals overnight. At the same time, I had several older relatives and family friends approaching retirement who were forced to quit or laid off before they could vest their full retirement benefits, after working at one company for decades.
@matdevdug @weilawei

Dan Jacob

@StephanieMoore @matdevdug as a kid growing up in Thatcher's Britain, the nightly news was factory after factory closing, much of it due to government monetary policy of raising interest rates to crush inflation - and bring the workers to heel.

The factories never came back. These layoffs remind me of that - not just a "correction" but the end of a whole class of work.

argv minus one

@StephanieMoore

Gen X did not, however, learn to mistrust the right-wing politicians who made it legal for businesses to do this.

Neither did Gen Y.

Will Gen Z? I'm not hopeful…

@matdevdug

ShredderFeeder

@matdevdug my current company did layoffs back in June with pathetic severance packages.. and people have been quitting enmasse ever since.

The other thing to remember is that many of these former employees will end up at customers or potential customers who will now NEVER look at your product and will actively discourage other people from even taking your calls...

There is a knock on effect to layoffs.

For two weeks severance I'm not signing a non disparagement agreement.

John Timaeus

@ShredderFeeder @matdevdug

I was recently talking with a friend who was looking at similar products from four companies. I did a quick search and saw that three of the four had recently done large layoffs, while the fourth was hiring. Guess which product I recommended?

ShredderFeeder

@johntimaeus @matdevdug Also - don't recomend companies that do stock buy backs. That's just a way to prop up their stock prices artifically, it's a huge lie.

Unixorn - 90% Snark by weight

@ShredderFeeder @matdevdug

Non disparagement agreements don’t always have the effect a company wants. I had a coworker a few jobs ago who was asked about using a product from one of his job.

“I can’t answer any questions about the product because they made me sign a non disparagement when I left”

We all assumed it was a shitshow and chose something else.

argv minus one

@ShredderFeeder

Weren't you already under a non-disparagement clause in your employment agreement?

@matdevdug

ShredderFeeder

@argv_minus_one shockingly not specifically. But either way an employment agreement ends the day employment does. Now I obviously can't go and divulge company secrets or anything like that... But the ONLY way they keep me from telling the truth about them is to keep me on payroll so the im still subject to the rules.

I will stay quiet for one week for every week of severance pay they give me.

argv minus one

@ShredderFeeder

That isn't true. Contracts can have provisions that survive termination, like non-compete clauses.

Bolo Lacertus

@matdevdug Companies can't empathize. You are better addressing the novices that might think they are alone in the realization that they were minions of an actual evil organization. (Driven mostly by greed an selfish goals, sadly, the most common type by far)
To them: Welcome, remember you yourself need not be evil nor alone.

Kat ♾️

@matdevdug Former exec recruiter turned entrepreneur here… Laying off, then rehiring a few months later just to meet your investor numbers is an all-to-common practice for US businesses, especially in tech and manufacturing. It’s a very expensive way to do business too. Short term gains. Long term costs beyond money. As others have said, you lose institutional knowledge, loyalty, develop a bad reputation as an employer, and you have to keep paying to hire and train people ($$$$$$).

@lisamelton

Daniel Quinn

@matdevdug it's not just those left behind. I was laid off back in 2001 and it's coloured my relationship with every employer since.

We broke our backs for that company, and they dismissed us without a second thought. Now I expect every employer to do the same and plan accordingly.

Cabbidges

@danielquinn @matdevdug
Last time I was laid off they ended up calling me to ask for a return, I did for a few months (better pay offer) but just walked out one day. No regrets.

Inertial Invites

@matdevdug
Did your experience with layoffs change your relationship with just that company, or did it make you reluctant to trust any similar company? I confess that after my treatment by one tech company I left the industry and can't really trust any similar company again.

SilvertipGrizz

@matdevdug Bingo ………. Have seen it first hand; bond of trust GONE forever.

Demian

@matdevdug this seems like one example of the callousness that’s generally quite pervasive. For sure, there are better companies but it seems like there are strong countervailing forces that make it difficult to establish or maintain environments that support people thriving

Flere-Imsaho 🇺🇦

@matdevdug Living in a country that has pretty strong unions and lots of laws concerning worker rights, this sounds heartbreaking. I sincerely hope this will change.

Katy Ereira 👩‍💻

@beandad @matdevdug You are not safe. I'm UK based. There are companies with offices in Germany, Spain, France, UK and Ireland that have managed it just fine. Ask me how I know. 🤷‍♀️

Flere-Imsaho 🇺🇦

@maccath @matdevdug Well, nobody's ever _completely_ safe I guess. But I assume OP is US-based and thus doesn't have the benefit of the social security nets that come on top of workers rights laws in many EU countries.

ℛ𝒾𝒸𝒽𝒶𝓇𝒹 𝒞𝑜𝓁𝑒

Bang on, there's nothing worst than having to reapply for the job you've been doing for years, especially when you're of the age when you could have taken the voluntary early retirement route.

Log 🪵

@matdevdug I have been through it multiple times. It would appear that it is not a suicide pact, further away from Silicon Valley. There is a bit more activation energy involved in switching employers.

But it's still not good.

I have been through enough that my default is to assume that the company wants to bleed me dry and throw me away. Never stop updating your resume.

It would also be great if we had a professional cartel that could successfully embargo these profit-goosing dipshits.

Captain Dragonfrog Queernabs

@matdevdug my last k public sector) employer handled a big budget cut with a round of layoffs.

A humane place would offer a severance package, wait to see the effect on payroll count, and then do layoffs after if necessary. They did the reverse. I'm 100% comfortable it was because the deputy minister in charge was a vindictive petty little asshole, and he didn't want to risk the people he resented leaving with dignity. He wanted them humiliatingly escorted out by security.

Leo

@matdevdug
Many years ago when mergers & downsizing was the thing, I was contracted to work on a data centre move as the Tech lead. A large bank bought out a bank in a much smaller city. After the migration both IT depts were congratulated by the VPs on their ability to pull off the migration without any service disruption to their customer base. The following month came the pink slips - they only needed one IT dept & they downsized the remaining one. IT staff with years of experience, excellent tech ability & corporate knowledge were betrayed in the name of corporate greed. This 'thing' was a disaster & now its back again!

@matdevdug
Many years ago when mergers & downsizing was the thing, I was contracted to work on a data centre move as the Tech lead. A large bank bought out a bank in a much smaller city. After the migration both IT depts were congratulated by the VPs on their ability to pull off the migration without any service disruption to their customer base. The following month came the pink slips - they only needed one IT dept & they downsized the remaining one. IT staff with years of experience, excellent...

ScottMGS

@matdevdug This has been my experience, too. And they always end with something like, "Don't worry. We don't plan on any more layoffs." ...until next time.

RodentFriend

@matdevdug been there, done that. It used to be a bad sign when there was a lot of turnover in an organization. Now it’s just business as usual.

Nicole Parsons

@matdevdug

There are pluses to these mass layoffs in tech and journalism:

1. Other industries now have access to skilled labor for long delayed IT infrastructure projects.

These industries have not been able to compete in recruiting in years.

These workers were in short supply for too long because the big five hogged the labor market.

The public sector in particular is benefitting from these counterproductive layoffs.

2. It releases skilled journalists from mainstream ...

1/3

Nicole Parsons

2/3

... media who suppress news about a growing anti-democracy movement funded by billionaires.

Feral, ticked off journalists with time on their hands is a boon to democracy.

3. Profitable companies doing pre-emptive layoffs for a "hasn't happened yet" recession.

It is being orchestrated by the financiers of the fossil fuel industry in an election year. These mass layoffs are politically motivated.

fortune.com/2023/01/23/christo

Anti-democracy advocates of Jan 6 like Larry Ellison are ...

2/3

... media who suppress news about a growing anti-democracy movement funded by billionaires.

Feral, ticked off journalists with time on their hands is a boon to democracy.

3. Profitable companies doing pre-emptive layoffs for a "hasn't happened yet" recession.

It is being orchestrated by the financiers of the fossil fuel industry in an election year. These mass layoffs are politically motivated.

Kailey 🏳️‍⚧️

@Npars01 @matdevdug Specifically speaking about the public sector. They haven’t been able to compete most often because they cannot pay what the private sector does. This doesn’t change that and if anything, the pay disparity between the public and private sector has only gotten worse. This isn’t their fault, we can't govern and fund departments appropriately because we refuse to tax wealthy people and corporations. Additionally, if you've ever tried to get a job in the public sector it can be a several months long process between testing for qualifications and a long, convoluted hiring process that is so fraught with red-tape they are practically telling people to not bother - unless nepotism, but hey, that’s the American way.

Ain't nobody got time for that. And I say this as someone who formerly worked in the public sector and likely wouldn’t mind doing it again.

@Npars01 @matdevdug Specifically speaking about the public sector. They haven’t been able to compete most often because they cannot pay what the private sector does. This doesn’t change that and if anything, the pay disparity between the public and private sector has only gotten worse. This isn’t their fault, we can't govern and fund departments appropriately because we refuse to tax wealthy people and corporations. Additionally, if you've ever tried to get a job in the public sector it can be a...

MWT

@kaibae @Npars01 @matdevdug
After a few decades in academia, I finally made it to a public sector job. It's just in New Zealand instead. Any time I looked at U.S. jobs, the paperwork involved in applying was full of so much bureaucratic noise that it sucked out all enthusiasm for trying to get through the process. I especially liked the ones that said "must already live in the commuting area" which meant "we're making an incumbent re-apply for their fixed-length contract job."

Urzl

@matdevdug The permanent morale hits from management duplicity is a lesson no company seems capable of learning.

"We'll randomly decimate your department while taking home a $60m bonus, but any morale questions on the employee survey are going to focus on middle management forever." - This has *never* worked.

We're not fooled by "Your direct supervisor might care and please let that reflect on the company as a whole".

Cotopaxi

@matdevdug One of my earliest life lessons is that there are two vital resources a savvy leader always takes very good care of: infrastructure and people. Any company, any human enterprise, is only as good as the people doing the work and the tools/support you give them. A business that disregards this truth may not die, but it will never excel. And it is for certain underestimating the damages that disgruntled employees will inflict by sabotage, whether overt or covert.

La temeraria

@matdevdug agreed. An "Employee of the Year" got sacked within months of her (well-deserved) award. She was shocked & devastated. I won an award the following year & it was meaningless to me b/c I knew it meant nothing to the company either.
Asked for a package the following year ahead of the annual year-end purge. The joy was gone. Money was great but I needed more.
Now I own & operate a kickboxing fitness gym. Financially tougher (thanks Covid) but it keeps me fit, happy and fulfilled.

The Tired Horizon

@matdevdug I've seen non tech contracts crumble a couple of times over here in the NHS. Brutal layoffs, bosses who took the difference in bonuses, morale destroyed. Then the Trust told the bosses to improve morale, so they spent £60k on a "motivational speaker" who was a fraud (lied about previous experience/psychology degree)...

Yakyu Night Owl

@matdevdug You're not alone. Tech isn't the only place this happens.

When people in education were let go after measure 5 passed in Oregon decades ago, a whole crowd of us left forever.

Joined a union with a no strike clause in their contract with the school district, and when it came to a vote, I was told to never discuss measure 5 with students.

We couldn't have been valuable to the schools, or our contracts would have reflected it in the first place. Muting our voices was part of the game.

Chris Real

@matdevdug

100% turnover is great for obliterating any retirement benefits plan.

My grandfather was laid off after 19 years and 50 weeks. You can guess what he was entitled to if he had worked there for 20 years.

Permanent part-time for service employees is a micro-management of the same goal.

remote procedure chris

@matdevdug there are some former "would work there in a heartbeat" companies for me who i will never feel the same way about. if it was between a former dream company and somewhere else i think it'd only come down to numbers, and even then it's hard to say i'd feel confident about it. how am I supposed to feel like I got where i wanted to be at a place that just shed all their institutional knowledge, might do it again, and is metaphorically selling shit off the walls to grind for earnings reports? what am i supposed to learn or look forward to? lame ass shit

@matdevdug there are some former "would work there in a heartbeat" companies for me who i will never feel the same way about. if it was between a former dream company and somewhere else i think it'd only come down to numbers, and even then it's hard to say i'd feel confident about it. how am I supposed to feel like I got where i wanted to be at a place that just shed all their institutional knowledge, might do it again, and is metaphorically selling shit off the walls to grind for earnings reports?...

Pablo Martini

@Npars01 @matdevdug@c.im That's the way the Rich stay Richer! Keeping a controlled workforce by poverty & fear! It's the serfs way!

Keith Hoodlet :verified: :donor:

@matdevdug and the people they hired to backfill the talent that left cost ~20 to 30% more than the people they already had. And the costs are now effectively the same, but with less talent available to do the job.

Bas Schouten

@matdevdug Maybe I am particular cold. But having witnessed some up close that is not my experience at all. I dealt with them just fine and my loyalty was not significantly affected.

I certainly think this is true for some individuals though.

sheislaurence

@matdevdug i am pretty sure back then (I was there) and now (I am here) corporations know exactly what they are doing and understand that whoever stays after a mass layoff will mostly likely resign within 6 months. That’s what happens in mergers (me: 2000) and that’s what’s happening now (X, Google, Salesforce…). The correct calculation they make is that new blood will fight to go through the door, undercut the market & espouse the new culture in hope of a quick promotion.

Dudley of Yesterzine :sms:

@matdevdug @Bowsette My last company got taken over after I’d been there over 12 years, my only industry job at the time. They claimed they wanted to do one and one only round of layoffs and I jumped at the chance to volunteer because I knew what was coming next.

I’d tell you, but you absolutely already know what happened next.

Yudderick & Co.

@matdevdug One of my formative experiences as a just-a-few-years-out-of-college employee was having to witness two rounds of layoffs. I made it through, but I got a front-row seat to the elderly and beloved department secretary tearfully asking if she could just say goodbye before security escorted her out (and of course being told no). Sixty or so years working for a company earned her absolutely zero compassion.

Soozcat

@matdevdug It's a relationship constant: better to maintain trust than try to regain trust. AND COMPANIES ALREADY KNOW THIS. Ask them about keeping customers as opposed to trying to win them back, and they get it immediately. But apparently employees aren't people, just "human resources."

Aut

@matdevdug@c.im My lived experience is much the same. It permanently damages your reputation with the employees. The times I've been through it the company was profitable at the time too so I really turned up the spite. Absolutely soulless to upend the lives of people to make a few more dollars

Chaotic Natural 20

@matdevdug
I concur. A company I worked for had a reputation in the industry for not ever laying people off. When it happened, it was a complete surprise.

Company has been bleeding talent ever since
@chrisisgr8

Syn-ACK :facepalm:

@matdevdug It has always been like this. It has always been about control. The difference here is that in times past, these companies weren't doing these layoffs all at the same time, so it gave tech workers the illusion that it wouldn't be so bad because there were other jobs to be found in a couple of weeks. But now that they're all doing it together, there aren't going to be other job offers for those who remain. They have nowhere to go.

The pandemic temporarily shifted the power to the workers and the corpos panicked and had to adapt. It showed the workers the truth that all those perks were designed to keep them "engaged" and "productive" - and under control. Now that the lockdowns have ended, this is the industry pushing back to restore the status quo and reassert control. They're doing it now en masse to reset the market using fear and intimidation - the venerable "hey, at least you still have a job" trope.

What they want are factory workers and the plain, sad fact of the matter is that there will always be young devs willing to do that factory work to make their bones in the industry. These companies do not care about the brain drain because they have an endless supply of young workers to brute force their way through it, and the users who are already locked into those platforms can't leave.

@matdevdug It has always been like this. It has always been about control. The difference here is that in times past, these companies weren't doing these layoffs all at the same time, so it gave tech workers the illusion that it wouldn't be so bad because there were other jobs to be found in a couple of weeks. But now that they're all doing it together, there aren't going to be other job offers for those who remain. They have nowhere to go.

argv minus one

@SynAck

> and the users who are already locked into those platforms can't leave.

And that is why I Just Say No™ to most proprietary software, especially if I would rely on it for anything I cannot live without. FOSS or GTFO.

Unfortunately, I have only mostly avoided vendor lock-in, and there are still a few proprietary things I use and can't replace…

@matdevdug

Syn-ACK :facepalm:

@argv_minus_one @matdevdug I only mentioned that part in the context of how these companies can continue to brute force their way past years of lost knowledge. The users are already locked in and while they may hate what the software has become, it's an important enough program for them that they can't just move on to something else without the risk of losing something significant (money, reach, friend base, etc.), especially when their livelihood may be on the line.

So once that choke point and the one that locks in their suppliers have set, the only place the corpos have left is to turn to cannibalizing their own workforce to increase their margins. Again, this has been going on for years (saw it happen multiple times on projects when I was with IBM). This is just the first time that they've essentially "done it in daylight" and decided to all do it at the same time, so they can leverage their workers pain and fear into their own gain.

That tide may shift once they see that AI won't live up to the hype, but that will likely be 3-5 years from now. At that point, they'll need all these workers back, but they likely won't be available. So the gristmill cycle will just continue on and the workers are left to pick up the pieces of their shattered careers.

@argv_minus_one @matdevdug I only mentioned that part in the context of how these companies can continue to brute force their way past years of lost knowledge. The users are already locked in and while they may hate what the software has become, it's an important enough program for them that they can't just move on to something else without the risk of losing something significant (money, reach, friend base, etc.), especially when their livelihood may be on the line.

Panama Red

@matdevdug Also true in other industries. I watched it happen in the newspaper biz as well as with online news orgs, before it finally happened to me.

crazyeddie

@matdevdug I'm generally in the first round of layoffs when they go down. I have a difficult time putting up with bullshit and so I piss off management. Every time, within a year the team I was on has either disbanded (or shut down by the company) or was sold off to some investment firm that sends all the jobs overseas. Twice in fact the whole entire company has been sold off and upper management walked away with a crap ton of $$. Layoff "survivors" are just being used longer.

Boiling Steam

@matdevdug Don't have a "relationship" with your company in the first place. your relationship is just a contract. It can be cut at any moment. The less you have feelings about where you work, the better. This is not a big family.

SKC

@matdevdug 500% this, the cost of layoffs themselves are high and then taking into consideration how it absolutely breaks any tether remaining employees have to the company has real lasting and chilling effects

Iris H. Richardson - Int. ArtH

@matdevdug That goes for almost all industries. The moment I saw the morale going sour I started to look for another job. I was not about to stick around to watch the slaughter. If I am reading the news right there will be a lot of tech layoffs again. Of course, that follows with the news claiming nobody wants to work anymore. Corporations are out of hand and nobody is doing anything about it.

Lester Ward

@matdevdug Something that layoffs taught me: don’t build your social life around coworkers. However the job ends, you’ll never really see them again.

Julianoë

@matdevdug they still make tonnes of money, why would they do differently honestly?

SnackTraces

@matdevdug
So much this ^^^^^

In addition we who have been laid-off walk away feeling broken. Such a hesitation to even mention that it happened that we put ourselves through more stress trying to avoid having to explain our departure in interviews.
@collinsworth

Max

@matdevdug @rauschma I still remember as an intern at Microsoft in 2006 how much the HR usuals parroted “We’ve never had a layoff in the history of the company” as a proud cultural badge. (It wasn’t entirely true, at that time the company was deeply the king of stack rank imposed soft layoffs giving people a few weeks to internally reinterview for their own jobs and blaming any failures on individuals’ performance rather than layoffs.)

James Trickle uP

@matdevdug I had my first layoff in the late 80s and the second in 92. My slightly more senior skill equal was laid off and sought a new job. Morale ruined I took one of the jobs he discarded and quit. Later I came back there to work with an older mentor, but suffered two layoffs, with a year and a half of sort of a limbo in the later position. Tired of being a connoisseur of layoffs, I resolved to never return to again. They had given me great experience and I had outgrown them.

Tim McNamara

@matdevdug You know it's bad when even the senior managers who are instructed to let go of entire teams leave within 6 months of the layoff round.

Go Up