Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
All posts Aral's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Brent Pruitt :: Artist

@aral
i've tried glaze on a few images & it's not for the patient & is cpu intensive.

it took ~12 hrs for 1 images to process on the medium scale & close 7hrs for the default settings.

it is awesome & i want to see more use…

19 January at 13:11 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.art
3 comments
mosttoast

@brentpruitt @aral I second this. I tried it on a 2019 MBP and it took 2-3 hours for a small jpg while taking all of my computing power. there also isn't any plan to port to linux which is a shame. I like the idea, but implementation is way off so far. Needs to be in the 10 minute/image range for me to consider using it on a regular basis imo.

19 January at 14:09 | Reply | Open on bostonmusic.online
Aral Balkan

@brentpruitt Oh, wow, I didn’t realise it was that computationally intensive.

19 January at 14:13 | Reply | Open on mastodon.ar.al
Brent Pruitt :: Artist

@aral
yea, with the number of art images on my site, i don't think it's feasible for me to use it on the regular just yet… maybe just the pieces i consider 'important' :D

anything to stop the theft!

glaze has been making really quick version updates, so who knows… fingers crossed

19 January at 15:25 | Reply | Open on mastodon.art
Go Up