@aral
i've tried glaze on a few images & it's not for the patient & is cpu intensive.
it took ~12 hrs for 1 images to process on the medium scale & close 7hrs for the default settings.
it is awesome & i want to see more use…
Top-level
@aral it took ~12 hrs for 1 images to process on the medium scale & close 7hrs for the default settings. it is awesome & i want to see more use… 3 comments
@aral anything to stop the theft! glaze has been making really quick version updates, so who knows… fingers crossed |
@brentpruitt @aral I second this. I tried it on a 2019 MBP and it took 2-3 hours for a small jpg while taking all of my computing power. there also isn't any plan to port to linux which is a shame. I like the idea, but implementation is way off so far. Needs to be in the 10 minute/image range for me to consider using it on a regular basis imo.