|
Top-level
 @chris @CriticalCupcake Everything you just mentioned was also brought to you by the arts. We categorize them to make them manageable, but they're all interconnected. It's the same thing as if someone tried to claim medicine was possible without science, just because some medical methods were discovered before modern science. That you're not even understanding this shows how much you need the arts. 6 comments
@chris @CriticalCupcake Well, here's some terms you might understand: if you really do live your life without the arts as you claim, you most likely have given yourself brain damage: https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/reading-books-brain-chemistry.html @eyrea @CriticalCupcake Just because the base work of science and arts might overlap does not mean art was there. Or needed. Sorry.  @chris @eyrea @CriticalCupcake Admitting you and your people made no cultural contributions at all is very brave. Here's Leonardo Da Vinci with an illustration (from 1480 or so) that clearly shows the potential lift created by a helicopter design. He also built models. Leo was known to dabble in illustration and painting too. There is no science without the arts. It's not a debate. Music is mathematics in a way that mathematics couldn't even dream about all by itself. @chris @eyrea @CriticalCupcake |
Gregory's Server
@eyrea @CriticalCupcake Saying "Physics is arts" shows how desperatly art people are trying to say "People need us!".
I am sure Isaac Newton had a lot of help from modern expressionist dancers while he discovered the Newton Laws.