@miah @malcircuit idk about IRC in the year 2024. Feels less accessible and clunky now, compared to the web-based chat options. Also, I like how you can create your own Discord "server" and populate it with as many channels as you wish.
Top-level
@miah @malcircuit idk about IRC in the year 2024. Feels less accessible and clunky now, compared to the web-based chat options. Also, I like how you can create your own Discord "server" and populate it with as many channels as you wish. 1 comment
|
@postmodern
The text-based open protocol has to be much more accessible than web-based chat options, unless we're using different meanings for "accessible". It also lets you use a web-based chat client or something like that for it if you want (and if there is one, I think there is), unlike some other services that won't even allow third-party clients.
My usual example for this flexibility in IRC is Microsoft Comic Chat (after disabling the noise it generates).
@postmodern
The text-based open protocol has to be much more accessible than web-based chat options, unless we're using different meanings for "accessible". It also lets you use a web-based chat client or something like that for it if you want (and if there is one, I think there is), unlike some other services that won't even allow third-party clients.