Gregory's Server@bhawthorne IMO the most reliable source will still be Wikipedia. The reason is, that the content is generated by humans. If someone adds content without a reliable source reference, it’s very likely, that it will be removed within minutes by other editors.
|
3 comments
@nicholas_saunders @bhawthorne Of course there are bots, that‘s nothing new. Editing can be limited to verified accounts. And I’m sure, there are other methods to prevent this kind of vandalism. Probably so. But maybe not. That's the litmus test: verified accounts. Also known as the #turingtest or at least a variant of. In all seriousness, I find #alexa not entirely unreasonable for this sort of thing. Usually useful. |
@BlueTurtleAI @bhawthorne
If someone adds content without a reliable source reference, it’s very likely, that it will be removed within minutes by other editors.
--
sorry, no, AI can out edit humans any day of the week. Allow me to direct your attention to this Wikipedia article by way of illustration:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_(folklore)
unless AI has edited it out of all resemblance...