@wikipedia Ah but the title, metadata, and database id is. Check and mate Wikipedia.
Top-level
@wikipedia Ah but the title, metadata, and database id is. Check and mate Wikipedia. 11 comments
@TerrorBite @freequaybuoy @wikipedia that actually appears to be how those centuries old wooden temples and other structures (at a minimum) in Japan work. @jmbreuer @TerrorBite @wikipedia See also the Great Mosque of Djenné, which has had its adobe composition replaced many times, yet is still the Great Mosque of Djenné. @freequaybuoy what people fail to realise is that i have been collecting discarded ship parts, and can now build a second and extremely fucked up ship. @freequaybuoy @julienbidoret @wikipedia The title, metadata and id would be the same regardless of how many replacements or migrations there were. @freequaybuoy @julienbidoret @wikipedia Just like the name “Ship of Theseus” (in Greek of course) remained the same with the original ship. @bhawthorne @julienbidoret @wikipedia Yeah! I think it comes down to agreement. The crew may have replaced all the parts but still sleep and sail on her. They may tell a merchant to load the spices on her, pointing to The Ship of Theseus and they would be none the wiser and agree that is indeed The Ship of Theseus. The knowledge that all parts have been replaced is metadata really, an outside text, requiring additional knowledge. Hence, "Truth is a community." |
@freequaybuoy Then consider the following scenario: I own a boat. Over time, I've replaced every single part of the boat, from the sails to the hull, but it still has the same name (title), the same registration number in the Register of Shipping (database id), and the same overall measurements (metadata). By your own argument, it's still the same boat.
@wikipedia