@balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron "Kant does not accept lies if we consider the categorical imperative"
This is only your opinion. You gave no further source.
Top-level
@balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron "Kant does not accept lies if we consider the categorical imperative" This is only your opinion. You gave no further source. 4 comments
@balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron Never stated "always right". But. Kant give clear logical rules to a ethic where also lying is allowed and a machine can understand this. @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron There is no paradoxity. You can lie with Kant if you also want that another person lie to you to safe a third persons life? @balkongast @ForeverExpat @Gargron This is clearly inside Kant. I would love that people lie to me if this safe the life of a person. Every ai would understand the logic behind this? |
@helles_sachsen @ForeverExpat @Gargron
Again, YOU have stated the automated Kant being always right. It is up to YOU to prove that being correct.
I just pointed to a paradoxity.