|
Top-level
 Today is a tough day, and we'd like to thank everyone for the outpouring of support and insightful questions. We're keeping a log of questions and concerns, will be sharing more answers as we have them. Keep in mind: The Matrix spec is the beating heart of the ecosystem. It is under an open source license, and subject to open governance that's slated to become more open when we elect our first Governing Board next year. #Matrix is bigger than any one or two projects. 5 comments
@n0toose This isn't a breakup with Element, but nonetheless you can expect the Foundation to put in a serious effort to gather feedback so that our efforts are appropriately targeted. On top of being the right thing to do, our resources are too scarce to spend time on solutions that aren't responsive to known issues. @chocolatefossty We definitely like that the new license they chose is still open source! AGPLv3 seems very appropriate, though we'd prefer for the projects to remain with the Foundation and without a CLA. The net of all this may end up being a boon for Element and/or the ecosystem, that remains to be seen. In the meantime, it definitely adds to the workload for the Foundation – in navigating the changes, and in building trust in our work.  AGPL is good, but the CLA means they can take your contributions and do whatever they want. And only them, nobody else. It's a perfect way to take open-source contributions and monopolize their position while taking profit and not having to give anything back. |
Gregory's Server
@matrix If this is a breakup with Element, PLEASE go around and ask non-Element-affiliated contributors of the ecosystem as to what's going wrong when you have the time and the capacity.
Sending warm regards and wishing you the best ❤