Lovely. The idiot politicians are once again trying to make math illegal.
Yeah, AI has a serious copyright issue, namely that using it to generate copyrightable works for you will eventually get you sued. “This is totally not a derivative work; look how many if statements I laundered it through” isn't gonna fly in court. No need to make AI illegal over copyright; infringing copyright with it is already illegal.
@argv_minus_one @chrisisgr8
right the copyright thing is ambiguous.
There's copyright vs Fair Use & derived works.
A lot of art is derived , e.g. darth vader = samuri+respirator +cape , star wars=flash gordon X hidden fortress, xwing=dragster X dart etc
The specific config is copyright ..but what if training is extracting the remixable components.
I can draw an X-wing but can't sell that(fine by me).
if we distribute a net with concepts we already have in our heads, is that really different
@argv_minus_one @chrisisgr8
right the copyright thing is ambiguous.
There's copyright vs Fair Use & derived works.
A lot of art is derived , e.g. darth vader = samuri+respirator +cape , star wars=flash gordon X hidden fortress, xwing=dragster X dart etc
The specific config is copyright ..but what if training is extracting the remixable components.