Gregory's Server@jwz This is the scariest possible outcome for "not me" driving a car >_>.
I'de rather take my chances with broken AI than a company hiring minimum wake workers to remote control a machine that can easily kill me with me inside.
Seriously... if an imployee ententionally or unintentionally caused an accident, the most they would have is being let go. The outside world thinks they are autonomous! So would the police. And the company wouldn't self-report due to being exposed.
Like. What. the. fuck.
This would qualify for Black Mirror
@jwz I like this person's comment:
>
@boonq
"its rivals fear Cruise's issues could lead to tougher driverless car rules for all of them"
Why would that be a problem, if their driverless vehicles actually work? Every rule would be irrelevant, because their vehicles already follow these rules on account of already working. It would be like legislating that all Californians are required to breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. It'd be a useless regulation because its requirements are already met and surpassed, on account of [two words omitted to provide you a fun little puzzle]
@jwz I like this person's comment:
>
@boonq
"its rivals fear Cruise's issues could lead to tougher driverless car rules for all of them"
Why would that be a problem, if their driverless vehicles actually work? Every rule would be irrelevant, because their vehicles already follow these rules on account of already working. It would be like legislating that all Californians are required to breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. It'd be a useless regulation because its requirements are already met...