@jwz I like this person's comment:

>

@boonq
"its rivals fear Cruise's issues could lead to tougher driverless car rules for all of them"

Why would that be a problem, if their driverless vehicles actually work? Every rule would be irrelevant, because their vehicles already follow these rules on account of already working. It would be like legislating that all Californians are required to breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. It'd be a useless regulation because its requirements are already met and surpassed, on account of [two words omitted to provide you a fun little puzzle]