@GustavinoBevilacqua I've thought about this since you wrote it.. I think this might be better system than the one specified here: http://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~dwjones/ternary/hept.shtml
I think I'll adopt that instead.
Top-level
@GustavinoBevilacqua I've thought about this since you wrote it.. I think this might be better system than the one specified here: http://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~dwjones/ternary/hept.shtml I think I'll adopt that instead. 4 comments
@GustavinoBevilacqua I think having a zero looks a bit nicer. The implementation is almost as simple. And you can start those numbers with 0Y (in analogy with 0X), since Y has three branches. @GustavinoBevilacqua haha that's cute, I thought maybe 0h, but 0y is best :) Thanks for the idea! |
@neauoire
You can replace 0 with @ to have the whole sequence.