I'm thinking of blocking access to content on my site to anyone not running an ad blocker.
Thoughts?
I'm thinking of blocking access to content on my site to anyone not running an ad blocker. Thoughts? 32 comments
@gcluley My problem with ad blockers is they are all or nothing. None of them consider whether ads are third-party or in-house, or indicate that to users. As a result, very, very few users who rely on ad blockers ever allow ads on any sites, even those that strictly observe same-origin policies about ads. @briankrebs But almost nobody does in-house ads any more—advertisers go via the big ad exchanges because that's how to get placed of lots of sites. @cstross @briankrebs to build on what Charlie said, for the handful of remaining sites that are in-house ads AND don't assault you with 50,000 ads per page you can just disable the blocker on that site. I did that for https://daringfireball.net/ because he's not a jerk about it and he wasn't using one of the major ad networks (at least in the past dunno about now). @gcluley Much as I like it, it's technically an ad. Luckily as I run an ad blocker I wouldn't see it. @gcluley - personally I don’t mind a few ads. If only I could be served an Ad without the tracking. 🤷♂️ @gcluley funny and helpful too 😃 And also, minor typo, you're missing a couple words in there I think ("heck of a lot safer") 😉 @gcluley I just use the reminder plugin on Wordpress. I can't speak to the effectiveness as I have no traffic, but I think it's a good idea. @gcluley only thought is some people will be using company machines which restricts the installation of such tools. @gcluley The snag is, the only robust way to detect an adblocker is by trying to load an actual ad I don't use ad blockers, but I use Firefox with its default security settings. This apparently causes many sites to *think* I'm running an ad blocker, based on the alerts I've been getting from them. |
@gcluley considering that most Ad and Malware detectors are a malware themselves, probably not a good idea.