@meganisalanis @efialto @twobiscuits @mariellequinton @mbonsma

"When pedestrians are far more likely to be injured or worse, it may mean we'd expect greater care to be taken with their own safety?"

I hear this often, but I don't follow the logic – there seems to be a step (or more) missing there, and no one who makes this claim seems able to fill it in.

What makes it different from requiring the target, not the shooter, to take greater responsibility for avoiding gunshot injury?