@Janealogy @Wuzzy Nope, adding locally known data to OpenStreetMap is great, as long as it can be verified on the ground.
I suspect, the crofts have a sign with their name?
Top-level
@Janealogy @Wuzzy Nope, adding locally known data to OpenStreetMap is great, as long as it can be verified on the ground. I suspect, the crofts have a sign with their name? 4 comments
@Janealogy @Wuzzy As an example, could I show up and ask a local, and they wouldn't know the name? That way, I'm still be able to verify it. Don't sweat it though, OSM isn't *that* strict with this rule. @Janealogy @Wuzzy Personally, I think it would be a great addition. You can always reach out to other local mappers first, and most of them would be happy to help too: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=11&lat=59.02816&lon=-3.05407&layers=B0FTFFFFT&contributors=FFTTTT (Orkney, for examples) — each user profile will have a "Send Message" link. |
@derickr @Wuzzy No, no signs for most, and many are in ruins now.