@openstreetmap @tracestrack with so many styles available maybe it's worth removing the "Cycle Map" one, since CyclOSM is superior and open source?
Top-level
@openstreetmap @tracestrack with so many styles available maybe it's worth removing the "Cycle Map" one, since CyclOSM is superior and open source? 4 comments
@thibaultmol @pintoch @openstreetmap Cycle Map is the most-used non-default layer with 2.3% of visitors using it. In August, the usage was Standard isn't included since 48% of users view it, being the default. @pnorman @thibaultmol @pintoch @openstreetmap I use Cycle Map mostly because it has place names in latin script, and sometimes because of topography. @pintoch @openstreetmap @tracestrack Maybe this new layer can be as good for hikers. The hillshading is rather overdramatic. (I don't actually like hillshading. It makes certain features visible or not according to which side of the mountain they are on.) |
@pintoch @openstreetmap I'm curious what their stats say. (how many people use what layer)
I think both have their purpose, they're visually very different from each other. but yeah