Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Foone🏳️‍⚧️

Everyone's all excited about "room temperature superconductors" and it's very hard to make them, but has anyone considered just cooling the room to 30 K / -243 C?

17 comments
Lewis Cowles

@foone it would be hilarious if "room temperature" superconductors was the headline, but this was the detail 😂

Drew Naylor

@foone Where's Jin when you need him?

nora, on the shoreless sea

@foone I'm personally in favor of this. Imagine how many sweaters I could wear!

Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷

@foone The trick is to build that DC on Pluto/Neptune/Uranus.

(An ancient still running crypto miner might explain why Neptune is warmer than Uranus.)

Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷

@foone I mean sure, the RTT is a bit bad, but it pays off for a long running job?

Janne

@foone yes! Cooling the room is relatively inexpensive, compared to resistivity losses. There are companies specializing in this.

I'm not cool enough to live in hts cable envelope, sadly :/

Robert Hollingshead :donor:

@foone wil be easier on Mars when SpaceX gets there in 2070. :)

Ian Maclure

@foone ...Yes!
"We find it notable that seekers of room-temperature superconductors spend all their time optimising the operating temperature of their materials, and ignore the temperature of the room that they put them in. For example, our laboratories in eastern Siberia rarely reach temperatures above -60c, and as such a room-temperature superconductor is more viable here than anywhere else in the world."

Dave Bittner

@foone Well I know the folks running the frozen food section of my local supermarket have.

Zorin =^o.o^=

@foone my A/C bill is bad enough already holy smokes.

Canageek

@foone help, our NMR text keep freezing solid on the way to the instrument

Григорий Клюшников

yes but "room temperature" probably means that the room is habitable but humans don't function very well when they are frozen

Go Up