@Androiders that is what i’m referring to. for me, it’s almost never right, or worse, it’s plausible but fundamentally incorrect in a way that wastes more time than if i just read the docs
Top-level
@Androiders that is what i’m referring to. for me, it’s almost never right, or worse, it’s plausible but fundamentally incorrect in a way that wastes more time than if i just read the docs 6 comments
@exchgr The Times i have used it it has helped me. I probably wouldnt use it when i need "expert" advice tough. So yeah, maybe it is exactly the case you stated in the first post😄 @Androiders it’s not really biased per se, it’s just jumbling up a bunch of words in statistically likely ways. and it’s scraping the web, for those words, so whatever biases it appears to have are really just those of writers on the web |
@exchgr yeah i get it. It is probably hugely biased in ways no one knows until it is used a lot.