Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Dr. Quadragon ❌

I stand by this type of entities needing a definition because eventually, we will have to move on. Something like Fediverse but better will emerge, maybe with different protocol, maybe with different federation principle (ask @cwebber about their work on CapTP or @mike about what he does with Zot), but inevitably so. It will be similar in decentralization, opennes and empowerment, but it won't be The Fediverse, it will be something else, albeit from the same family of networks.

6 comments
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@uu совершенно верно. Но эволюция это процесс. Я ищу определение ее продукта конкретно в этом направлении.

@cwebber @mike

Dr. Quadragon ❌

@cwebber by the way. Where is Evan? Has he long forgotten us?

@mike

CapitalB

@drq @cwebber @mike like gopher and www. Or gnutella and bittorrent. Some day a jump happens and it REALLY takes off.

Chris [list of seasonal emoji]

@drq @cwebber @mike

The dividing line (AFAICT) is post-scarcity vs artificial scarcity.

The AS fuckers grabbed the "web3" name because they have lots of money. But we don't need lots of money to survive and they do, so we'll win as soon as they run out of suckers.

smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)

@drq @cwebber @mike

Forget Metaverse. Who wants to be meta with the Zuck there anyway? #Fediverse is the #PeopleVerse

Web3? Why version this thing, and pretend that is meaningful? We have a mess anyway where it is all blurry. Fediverse offers us a beautiful and intricate #SocialFabric. We weave web here.

🎉 Happy #Fedivolution2022 🚀

#WeThePeopleVerse #WeWeaveWeb

Go Up