@oceane I'm honestly confused by what you are arguing for, and I *heavily* disagree on your statement criticising moral communication in politics. Politics IS an application of morality. I wouldn't bother listening to a political opinion if it is not making moral arguments as its main argument, as no one should.
@unexpectedteapot Aren't you confusing morality (individual community intelligence) with ethics (collective community intelligence)? Yes, political statements should be grounded in ethics, but I'm no one to assert an individual choice on everyone.
In the FSF case, I'm sure people would use free software more if they felt it was flexible enough. I'm definitely using the Tor network more since I'm juggling between Librewolf (for SaaSS in which I'm authenticated) and the Tor browser (which I use to read documents, lookup Stack Overflow, Wikipedia, read a blog post, etc.). Anyway, forbidding free software users to use proprietary software is both the FSF's PRs and Microsoft's strategy. That's an example of the moral judgements I'm talking about, but IME it tends to be a poor org's publication, when it has nothing else to say than “capitalism is bad, join us now”.
@unexpectedteapot Aren't you confusing morality (individual community intelligence) with ethics (collective community intelligence)? Yes, political statements should be grounded in ethics, but I'm no one to assert an individual choice on everyone.
In the FSF case, I'm sure people would use free software more if they felt it was flexible enough. I'm definitely using the Tor network more since I'm juggling between Librewolf (for SaaSS in which I'm authenticated) and the Tor browser (which I use to...