Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
O. Simard-Casanova in English

@pitbuster @feditips This is a patently false statement

Their pivot toward open source date back to 2013-ish, way before they started to invest in AI

6 comments
Buster | Felipe

@osc yeah, I was trolling on that one, I admit. But, they open source tools here and there, and how they actually contribute to the rest of the ecosystem? There are ton of "open source friendly" corporations that are still shit.

@feditips

Buster | Felipe replied to O. Simard-Casanova in English

@osc Dude, you are the one that brought MS to the thread. Meta also had a lot of opensource contributions and it doesn't change the fact that they profit on surveillance, which is the point @feditips was making all along.

O. Simard-Casanova in English replied to Buster | Felipe

@pitbuster @feditips I literally never disputed that Meta nor Microsoft profit on surveillance lol

Reading is a skill you usually learn in primary school, what about exercising it?

Buster | Felipe replied to O. Simard-Casanova in English

@osc lol an economist bragging about reading comprehension @feditips

Jon replied to Buster | Felipe

@pitbuster Yeah really. But I've also seen a lot of techies say "Facebook has contributed React and does a lot for open source software, so let's not talk about the genocide" so it's not just economists who take this kind of position.

It's kind of like saying "Monsanto has a great Pride float, so it's just fine to take funding from them!"

@osc @feditips

Go Up