Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Hisham

WebAssembly is cool and all, but it's depressing that the future of the web is binary.

So many people who grew up in the Web 1.0 era of HTML and JavaScript got their start exploring code with the "View source..." menu option.

I know Web 2.0 virtually killed the source-nature of the Web already, but Wasm is the final nail in the coffin.

9 comments
Michal :verified:

@hisham_hm do you consider the older "transpiled-to-Javascript" (asm.js) better alternative?

Zlatko Duric

@hisham_hm I don't see it as that bad, JavaScript is not going away. But the truth is, the phones are now powerful enough to run entire operating systems within browser tabs. So we're getting much more capabilities then we had.

But yeah, that means that some of those more advanced apps will not be open source. They're not open source even now though.

Benoit

@hisham_hm But now you can run htop on the browser itself :troll:

Lawrence Pritchard Waterhouse

@hisham_hm The same goes for HTTP 2.0 and onwards. Or binary log files (*cough*systemd*cough*). It usually is more space-efficient and thus faster, but things get a LOT less discoverable, which is a real, tangible loss (I've met many recent CS graduates who get that same blank its-magic look on their faces all the time that I used to expect only from non-powerusers).

Erik Uden :verified:

Showing people how I could press F12 and change stuff on the school’s website made them think I was hackerman 😔

Benny Powers 🇨🇦️🇮🇱️

@hisham_hm Web components reverses this trend, and before you say it can't be done, load up Photoshop web

Nath

@hisham_hm nowadays many websites are minified so the "view source" option is not really helpful even without using wasm.

Go Up