@Cuntsaw it's important to understand that they ask that not to uphold any standard of rigour and fact checking, but rather so they can go and derail the conversation by scoffing at the source and throwing bafflegab and bullshit on the field as a distraction.
@reneestephen @Cuntsaw @moh_kohn A sceptic researching that graphic would find out it was created by a self proclaimed climate doomer, Prof. Eliot Jacobson - and would then ignore it. However, Jacobson's source is solid: climatereanalyser.com, and the data is on the site, see https://twitter.com/EliotJacobson/status/1667581291360030721
as well as this https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/
Data is the one thing we have on deniers. Use it.
https://climatereanalyzer.org/wx/todays-weather/?var_id=t2anom&ortho=7&wt=1
@reneestephen @Cuntsaw @moh_kohn A sceptic researching that graphic would find out it was created by a self proclaimed climate doomer, Prof. Eliot Jacobson - and would then ignore it. However, Jacobson's source is solid: climatereanalyser.com, and the data is on the site, see https://twitter.com/EliotJacobson/status/1667581291360030721
as well as this https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/
Data is the one thing we have on deniers. Use it.
https://climatereanalyzer.org/wx/today...