Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Mx Amber Alex

@Em0nM4stodon everyone has "something to hide":

Financial problems, illnesses, ridiculed hobbies, sexual preferences, the extent of their nicotine habit… and most importantly: other people's secrets.

It's not just about protecting your or my communications, it's that my emails give insight into the lives of my family, my partners, my friends, into my work, etc etc.

John Doe don't just have to consider whether he wants his private life protected, he also has to consider Aunt Mary's marital problems, Uncle Jack's alcoholism, Cousin Peter's erectal dysfunction, Grandma Anne's cancer, Cousin Jenny's dates, and his employer's internal crises.

He has to protect all that not only against overeager cops with no regard for civil rights, but also against data leaks and hackers.

How anyone who isn't a cop can attack encryption in good faith is beyond me.

9 comments
Em :official_verified:

@amberage YES! This is such an important point! Protecting *other's* people personal information is a duty we should all take WAY more seriously.

mav :happy_blob:

@amberage @Em0nM4stodon Fully agreed all the time.

Everybody has something to hide, even if it's only their surprisingly vanilla porn habits and how they secretly still text their ex. "I got nothin' to hide" is the sort of thing people say when they don't understand how law works.

The Doctor

@amberage @Em0nM4stodon It's not in good faith at all, and should not be considered as such.

mnemonicoverload

@amberage
This is it, exactly. Anyone who says doesn't care about privacy because they "have nothing to hide" is telling you loudly and in no uncertain terms that they don't care about the privacy of anyone else they communicate with either, weather they realize it or not.

@Em0nM4stodon

Go Up