Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Eugen Rochko

What if we had an "untrusted" notifications tab for interactions from unfamiliar users...

27 comments
GMate8

@Gargron because it makes no sense, and make notifications tab confusing

Gambino689

@Gargron @gmate8 It would add yet another tab to the top of the screen for no reason or added benefit.

GMate8

@Gargron it would be better to isloate dms and have a untrusted dms feature

phαη†⊕m :fedora: 🎸 🏳️‍🌈 ⏚

@Gargron Doesn't that make too many tabs? Maybe a particular color instead?
Don't want to have 10 tabs in mastoson.

Eugen Rochko

@Steve12L Different color won't save you from getting pinged which is the main annoyance from spam

phαη†⊕m :fedora: 🎸 🏳️‍🌈 ⏚

@Gargron Yes i know. I don't know what is the best solution honestly.

Touk

@Gargron Why a new tab and not a filter/toggle?

infinite love ⴳ

@Gargron port over the notification options from the ios app (everyone / follows / followers / mutuals / no one)? or maybe just collapse it into two categories, "all" and "in your network" (which includes people who follow you or you follow, i guess?)

Eugen Rochko

@trwnh I love that iOS app setting but if we're talking about spam, it's not a solution. I'm sure a lot of people won't want to set it to "anyone I follow" only and then you're on square one.

infinite love ⴳ

@Gargron maybe something like filtering out a notification if it contains a link and no one follows that user locally? would at least stop link-spam

although idk i personally still think a widespread culture of human-reviewed signups is the best safeguard against spam -- anything beyond that is plugging leaky holes...

Eugen Rochko

@trwnh Any sign-up delay causes dramatic drop-off in onboarding. You might get rid of spammers but you'll also get rid of the majority of legitimate people trying the platform out.

Marcus

@Gargron If you wanted to break notifications off into trusted and untrusted, perhaps just have an icon next to them or something. At least for me, I don't get enough interactions on my posts to warrant having two separate notifications tabs, it would just add unnecessary complexity to the interface.

I guess it also depends on how a user is identified as being "trusted". Is that people you follow? People from trusted Mastodon instances?

Making the feature optional/toggle-able would be nice.

Gary Murphy

@Gargron I am in favor of it, can you tell us more? "unknown" rather than "untrustworthy"/ what do you think?

codythedragonrude

@Gargron what if i could make all my posts not be forced unlisted

they are set to public in the settings yet still post as unlisted

Rysiekúr Memesson 🇺🇦

@Gargron or at least a filter a user could enable in the settings: "Do not show notifications about interactions with unknown users".

d(jack’o la)ngo 🎃

@Gargron if this is about spam then maybe the server can do some threshold flood check for duplicate content

kinzie :breathe:

@Gargron I think it's a good idea. It gives users more control over the types of interactions they have on Mastodon.

If someone only wants to interact with people they trust, I think they should be able to, and having a known/unknown users filter would help facilitate that.

Brayd :mastodon: :vegan:

@Gargron I think this would confuse users. I’d prefer to have another feature, which is off-topic: fed-wide amounts of faves. Currently faved toots are only per instance, which I personally don’t like.

Go Up