Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Hughster

@afterconnery @hamishb @chrisblake They didn't, and they never can. Even before Beeching trains only went to towns, and only past the occasional village on the way. And the routes didn't take you in every direction you might want to go. (They certainly don't now.) Good luck trying to build railways to every village with today's prices...

6 comments
DELETED

@hughster @hamishb @chrisblake That's funny because trains did that where I'm from. And canals did it before trains. It stopped when auto companies bought out and then gutted other forms of transportation. It may be different where you're from, but your history is different than mine. Try not to universalize your history upon everyone else.

Hughster

@afterconnery Canals connected every village to every other village? Really?

DELETED

@hughster Here is an example from near where i live. This one ended up as a bust, but they were being built everywhere at the time. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitew

Also the Cardinal Greenway, rails to trail path, goes from Richmond to Muncie and there are various towns along the way. A hundred years ago people would take weekend trips from Richmond to these small towns by rail.

Hughster

@afterconnery It doesn't look like that canal went to an awful lot of villages. And for those lucky enough to have been on the route who wanted to go to other places on the route, what would the journey times have been for passengers in the towpath era?

DELETED replied to Hughster

@hughster It was in the 1800's. You do realize there were billions less people around then right? There were not many other villages at that time. Try reading history more and stop being daft. Its ok to be wrong about something.

Hughster replied to DELETED

@afterconnery You were the one who told me canals connected all the villages together before cars:
fosstodon.org/@afterconnery/11

We both know that villages weren't connected together in any way comparable to what's been possible since cars came along, and with current technology there's no way they could stay connected to anywhere near the same degree without them.

It's OK to admit that cars have positives in low density environments.

@afterconnery You were the one who told me canals connected all the villages together before cars:
fosstodon.org/@afterconnery/11

We both know that villages weren't connected together in any way comparable to what's been possible since cars came along, and with current technology there's no way they could stay connected to anywhere near the same degree without them.

Go Up