It’s fascinating how some people effectively want to boil the internet back down to the AOL walled garden model where the entire internet exists within Facebook
It’s fascinating how some people effectively want to boil the internet back down to the AOL walled garden model where the entire internet exists within Facebook 9 comments
@jerry if the whole of the internet moves into Facebook idk. I mean on the one hand a bunch of people will be trapped behind that walled garden and that seems bad, but on the other hand a sliver of very technical people will have a whole internet to themselves outside it, just like the 80/90s... @jerry A lot of us techies share in the blame, IMO. We tell each other that teaching users the basics of the domain name system (and HTTPS) is a waste of time..... so most ppl do not understand their significance. After a while, they start looking at different addresses as noise that just gets in the way of using "App". I think if we as a society can't be bothered with "who" we communicate at a semantic level, then we can't sustain an open Internet (and probably not an open society, either). @jerry "you can have your internet on any platform you want so long as it's owned." @jerry Elmo has already said he wants X (currently vaguely remembered as Twitter), not the desktop X, to be exactly that - a one-stop shop and pervasive echo chamber for Republican-style free (free as in herpes) speech It’s the user base that creates the possibility. Level 0 computer users struggle enough with just email and Facebook. Personally I would shout for joy if Facebook disappeared tomorrow. I used to work for CompServe and then AOL so I'm not going to comment on that except to say that both offered a full Internet experience 😇🤷♂️ |
@jerry Remember MSN?