Still working on arity-checking, one simple type that has eluded me until now is when a function doesn't return at all, but falls into the next one.
Finally got around to validating for this one.
Still working on arity-checking, one simple type that has eluded me until now is when a function doesn't return at all, but falls into the next one. Finally got around to validating for this one. 5 comments
@nomand very much :ouroboros: edit: To be clear, Uxntal hasn't changed. It's the same language as it was, but writing type inference reveals its hidden intricacies, similarly to how writing a BNF notation for a language might also. |
I remember once explaining uxntal as "simple" language, well, needless to say you won't be catching me calling uxntal simple again.