Gregory's ServerYeah honestly I feel like loli is an attempt to get child porn normalised under the guise of "it's just drawings."
Drawn gay porn is still gay porn. It doesn't stop being gay porn because it's a drawing.
Why the fuck do they look at it? Why do they want to see children being sexualised? Do they have literal CSAM on their devices? Why is it being drawn any different?
"But it's cute!" I have heard people say.
What is cute about a sexualised minor??? You do know most people... don't find that cute right? Most people find that revolting, on account of literally sexualising beings who cannot consent to sex or being sexualised, even in fiction, it's what it represents. If you think that's cute, do you think actual CSAM is cute?
Shit is ridiculous.
@Elizafox There is also shotacon situation which is kinda weird and even more controversial
I guess I understand why it doesn’t get the same reaction as it should be as it is related to the same issues as loli, since most of it is watched by male audience that is putting themselves in the body of this character in their imagination so it’s mostly about size difference fetish and “active” member being female fetish for them…
This is still by any means not morally correct, but also, it is usually quietly taken under the rug and forgotten, so it may be better to at least mention it
@Elizafox There is also shotacon situation which is kinda weird and even more controversial
I guess I understand why it doesn’t get the same reaction as it should be as it is related to the same issues as loli, since most of it is watched by male audience that is putting themselves in the body of this character in their imagination so it’s mostly about size difference fetish and “active” member being female fetish for them…