Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Tom Walker

Seeing people post positively about Substack now that it's challenging Twitter.

Reminder: Substack is also centralised. Worse, the business model is basically to take what would once have been blogs and paywall them as premium 'newsletters'.

Substack is not a friend of the open web.

6 comments
Lance

@tomw My understanding was that you can set up a totally free site, and you don't have to monetize if you don't want to.

In that respect, it doesn't seem all too different from Blogspot. But maybe things have changed recently.

Tom Walker

@analogfusion They push people to add a paywall, and whenever you click a link to Substack, it might be paywalled (there's no way to know before clicking).

Lance

@tomw I think I created an account but haven't used it yet for anything, so I can't say how hard they push on upselling the paid model. Obviously they want as many users as possible to monetize because that's how they turn a profit (and subsidize the free accounts).

But the paywall is still up to the discretion of the account holder, isn't it? With the steep decline in journalism as a viable profession, I can't fault a writer for wanting to make a living.

𝚝𝚓𝚠

@tomw one thing I weirdly like about it is a lot of opinions that are both odious and preaching to the choir tripe are paywalled out of having real reach.

Tom Walker

@thomasjwebb Yes, it is a trap for writers to give up reach for a bit of money (with the hope that it will become a lot at some point). I suppose there is a schadenfreude if people with repulsive views fall into that.

Go Up