Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jamie Clark

@J12t If you only ask W3C activity members where they wish to do work, and avoid asking anyone not in that org, you're probably gonna get the answer you expect.
I did hear a couple of legitimate stakeholders at your #fediforum last week say they weren't comfortable with joining that effort; I'm not sure I ever heard why.
From being in (and recruiting into) similar efforts, over the decades, we all know there's a sharp incline in perception, from regular participants to nonmembers. Your challenge there is not winning over Tantek … He already knows how to navigate W3C :) It's winning over devs who may not be as familiar with how open or how easy that workgroup is, or what its biases are. Cc @evan

1 comment
Johannes Ernst

@jamiexml Lots of history, interpersonal dynamics, politics, human messiness, and all of that, and I realize that :-) Ultimately the Fediverse, if it is successful, will end up, and need to end up, with multiple centers of overlapping governance -- like most "non-autocratic" human systems.

All help wanted to get as much as possible moving in roughly the right direction. Currently there is little movement regarding standardization at all, and that needs to change IMHO.

/cc @evan

Go Up