Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Frances_Larina πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

@cautionwip @charliejane

Oh, I didn't think it was at all, "nice to hear" in that context! I think I probably just didn't word my comment very precisely. My apologies to both of you!

5 comments
CautionWIP πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

@Frances_Larina @charliejane I don’t think you have anything to apologize for, though I can’t speak for Charlie Jane. (πŸ€— if appropriate ) It’s a perfectly valid take and particularly understandable in your own situation of just having seen it used so awfully, personally, and recently. Also, I’m sorry you had to experience that. Some people just suck.

The Trandalorian πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

@cautionwip @Frances_Larina I think "everybody should have to have an opinion on all topics" would be a horrible rule. I don't have opinions about sports because I don't follow sports.

On the small number of issues where people's lives are at stake, I try to educate myself, but also to listen to people who have direct experience, or who belong to the marginalized communities affected.

I don't think we're actually disagreeing here.

CautionWIP πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ

@charliejane @Frances_Larina Ratified, on both points. As far as I read it, Frances (or is it Larena? Apologies if I’m getting it wrong) was noting a very specific application of that statement and its abuse by those who claim to be progressive and potential allies, which is a valid elaboration on your OP and I didn’t see it as a denial, but rather an addition.

The Trandalorian πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

@cautionwip @Frances_Larina Yeah, that makes sense.

And honestly, any statement can be used in bad faith and weaponized by evil people to support inaction or wrong action.

Go Up