Oh, I didn't think it was at all, "nice to hear" in that context! I think I probably just didn't word my comment very precisely. My apologies to both of you!
Top-level
Oh, I didn't think it was at all, "nice to hear" in that context! I think I probably just didn't word my comment very precisely. My apologies to both of you! 5 comments
@cautionwip @Frances_Larina I think "everybody should have to have an opinion on all topics" would be a horrible rule. I don't have opinions about sports because I don't follow sports. On the small number of issues where people's lives are at stake, I try to educate myself, but also to listen to people who have direct experience, or who belong to the marginalized communities affected. I don't think we're actually disagreeing here. @charliejane @Frances_Larina Ratified, on both points. As far as I read it, Frances (or is it Larena? Apologies if Iβm getting it wrong) was noting a very specific application of that statement and its abuse by those who claim to be progressive and potential allies, which is a valid elaboration on your OP and I didnβt see it as a denial, but rather an addition. @cautionwip @Frances_Larina Yeah, that makes sense. And honestly, any statement can be used in bad faith and weaponized by evil people to support inaction or wrong action. |
@Frances_Larina @charliejane I donβt think you have anything to apologize for, though I canβt speak for Charlie Jane. (π€ if appropriate ) Itβs a perfectly valid take and particularly understandable in your own situation of just having seen it used so awfully, personally, and recently. Also, Iβm sorry you had to experience that. Some people just suck.