Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
18 comments
Bread and Circuses

@petergleick
Thanks, Peter. That's excellent -- and horrifying.

Litzz11

@petergleick Someone on NextDoor (neighborhood social media site in the US, which most people use for lost pets and home repair recommendations) posted a video by some crackpot "geomythologist" featured on Joe Rogan's podcast that PROVES climate change is a hoax because arrgle barrrgle reasons and ... so I thought I'd Google the guy and here he is. Can you make your graphics a little, um, sexier? Maybe throw a pyramid or two in there? Cuz this is what we're up against.

Peter Gleick

@Litzz11 The best way to deal with these Nextdoor weird posts is (IMO) to either ignore them; or mock them. This one is pretty obviously kooky.

SΓ©bastien Garnier

@petergleick

Some/most are completely fine with that.

Here is the view of the largest party in the European Parliament:

respublicae.eu/@EPPGroup/11001

Ellis Wyatt

@petergleick What happened before that 800k years and why (other than that's as far back as ice samples go) did you decide that was the place to start?

Peter Gleick

@elliswyatt There are actually good data showing that current CO2 levels are higher than anytime in the past 5 MILLION years. The graph goes back 800,000 to cover the excellent quality ice-cores data.

Ellis Wyatt

@petergleick Which is really not answering the question.

For instance, the last time there was a period of CO2 as LOW as we have it now, the latter half of the carboniferous period, it resulted in global glaciation.

Historically, since that time, the ppm has been around 2000.

So the question is, why is the greenest point in our carbon history unattractive, and the coldest and unhospitable time desirable?

legraLeGra

@elliswyatt @petergleick CO2 in the above is from the gas bubbles trapped in ice cores β€” there is older ice than 800000 years, but it has been chewed up and altered and complicated, thus not done yet (cp.copernicus.org/articles/18/). Before that, you can use pH from the ocean to infer CO2 in the atmosphere. p-co2.org/boron#

Nicole Parsons

@petergleick

When the volcanic eruptions in the Siberian Traps occurred it triggered the Permian Extinction.

Over 80% of marine species went extinct. Over 70% of land species went extinct.

CO2 levels today are climbing to those levels.

The oil industry is funding fascism because they possess the best climate forecasters and know what's coming.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberi.

Nicole Parsons

@HistoPol @petergleick

We may not have firm evidence of the consequences of environmental microplastics, but we do have ample evidence of the catastrophic effects of atmospheric particulates.

They trigger famines, little ice ages, and the end of civilizations.

Not one great empire survived unscathed from the volcanic activities of 536 AD. Roman. Chinese. Ganges. Sassanid

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcan

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcan.

eos.org/articles/how-modern-em

pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/g

@HistoPol @petergleick

We may not have firm evidence of the consequences of environmental microplastics, but we do have ample evidence of the catastrophic effects of atmospheric particulates.

They trigger famines, little ice ages, and the end of civilizations.

Not one great empire survived unscathed from the volcanic activities of 536 AD. Roman. Chinese. Ganges. Sassanid

HistoPol (#HP)

@Npars01 @petergleick

I completely agree with your summary.

However, not being an environmental scientist and they stating that at this point cannot determine the direction in which this is going, I don't dare to contradict:

"But whether they would warm, or cool, the Earth is unknown...
These plastics are incredibly long lived. They’re breaking down, and they’re going to be forming new microplastics for centuries. We just don’t know how big the problem is that we’ve...

HistoPol (#HP)

@Npars01 @petergleick

... committed ourselves to.”

What really gives me headaches:

"The murk of anthropogenic aerosols in the sky has, overall, had a dramatic cooling effect since the Industrial Revolution (without them, *global warming would be 30 to 50 per cent greater than it is today*). And they have more sway on extreme weather than greenhouse gases do: a world warmed by removing aerosols would have more floods and droughts, for example, than a world warmed the same...

HistoPol (#HP)

@Npars01 @petergleick

"...amount by CO2."

So, in fact, without the offsetting effect of aerosols, we could already be competing with #Dune to be the new habitat for #sandworms.

If airborne microplastics were to solve our #GlobalWarming problems in the same way, this would just be an irony of fate, undeservedly so, I must say. ;)

Source: thetyee.ca/Analysis/2023/03/14

Arnan de Gans

@petergleick so we go from dotted graph to drawn in graph?

Go Up