Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Chris's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
fulanigirl

@Qazm @atomicpoet @kraft @fediversenews yeah, it's an interesting issue. And I suppose that might create more work for the server administrators. For people whose WP sites are for marginalized folks that might be problematic.

11 Mar 2023 at 19:41 | Wall-to-wall | Open on blacktwitter.io
7 comments
Qazm

@fulanigirl @atomicpoet @kraft @fediversenews There's discussing about adding reply control to ActivityPub here, in case you're curious about why that's (more) difficult (than on a centralised platform): github.com/w3c/activitypub/iss

The long and short of it is that various implementations handle authorisation a bit differently from each other, so a solution must be found that's acceptable with multiple methods.

11 Mar 2023 at 19:57 | Open on tiggi.es
fulanigirl

@Qazm @atomicpoet @kraft @fediversenews took a look at the link and the first thing I thought was: coders are really lawyers! We have have long extensive discussions about "should", 'must." and "can."But I think the thread does raise the relevant concerns. The monetization re ads is a good point also. We don't have ads but I can see that registering someone as a hit on the site itself would be important. I appreciate the folks who take the time to work these things out.

11 Mar 2023 at 20:18 | Open on blacktwitter.io
Qazm

@fulanigirl @atomicpoet @kraft @fediversenews We have rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119 fortunately, which standardized at least the language in this regard in a simple way.

A LOT of especially the low-level protocols effectively run on these "request for comments" documents, while the w3.org manages mainly recommendations for higher-level protocols like web pages, web accessibility (in terms of disability accommodation features) and ActivityPub.

(There's also the IEEE, which, among many other things, publishes often very polished and nice standards documents for certain data exchange formats like JPEG, but they're quite expensive to access.)

Not all of these are nice to work with. Certain grown systems like IRC and email can be difficult to implement in a way that works in practice with large existing implementations, for example, even if the original core protocol is very simple. Many RFCs describe fairly complex compounds that reference other de-facto standards, too.

@fulanigirl @atomicpoet @kraft @fediversenews We have rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119 fortunately, which standardized at least the language in this regard in a simple way.

A LOT of especially the low-level protocols effectively run on these "request for comments" documents, while the w3.org manages mainly recommendations for higher-level protocols like web pages, web accessibility (in terms of disability accommodation features) and ActivityPub.

11 Mar 2023 at 20:57 | Open on tiggi.es
Chris Trottier

@Qazm @fulanigirl @kraft @fediversenews Comment control already exists on Hubzilla and Streams. I’ve used it, and it works well.

11 Mar 2023 at 20:29 | Open on mastodon.social
Qazm

@atomicpoet @fulanigirl @kraft @fediversenews Do you have a link with more info on hand? If I try to look this up for Hubzilla, that appears to be a Zot (which I can't find the spec of currently) rather than an ActivityPub feature.

11 Mar 2023 at 21:19 | Open on tiggi.es
Mike Macgirvin
The comment control feature is protocol agnostic. In streams, there is an app called 'Comment Control'. Install it and you have full control of comments on every post. In Hubzilla, this is controlled in the permission dialogs, and I believe you can set comment controls for a channel, but not per-post as you can do with streams. We tend to share a lot of ideas between these two repositories so the newer control will probably show up on Hubzilla eventually.

Federation isn't really involved in comment control. If I don't want to see your comment, it is my divine right to refuse it or delete it. The only place federation is involved is to not provide a comment box if we know in advance that the comment is only going into the rubbish bin and save you typing a long reply into space.  

The zot/6 spec is under 'spec' in the Hubzilla repo and there are some implementation details of the ActivityPub implementation of comment controls in FEDERATION.md in the streams repository. We've since extended these to be at least partially compatible with FEP-5624 -- if you don't like the way we implemented it in 2012. Since nobody has shown any real interest in nomadic identity or working together on better permission controls on the fediverse (preferring to extinguish us instead), I haven't yet provided a spec for Nomad (which is basically Zot/11). The streams repository does include the only known reference implementation of Nomad.
The comment control feature is protocol agnostic. In streams, there is an app called 'Comment Control'. Install it and you have full control of comments on every post. In Hubzilla, this is controlled in the permission dialogs, and I believe you can set comment controls for a channel, but not per-post as you can do with streams. We tend to share a lot of ideas between these two repositories so the newer control will probably show up on Hubzilla eventually.
11 Mar 2023 at 21:59 | Open on macgirvin.com
Chris Trottier

@mike @fediversenews Who is trying to extinguish nomadic identity? I’ve been a big fan of your work. And when I mention the concept to others, I only get positive responses.

11 Mar 2023 at 23:01 | Open on mastodon.social
Go Up