What do you think about that hidden dislikes on replies idea that Twitter is testing?
34 comments
@Gargron I understand why they think it might work -- it's not that far removed from upvotes/downvotes, innit -- but in practice, it's hard not to think, is this just a new way for people to get harassed. I think that modern IT companies are bad. At this point they just can't declare that their product is done, leave it alone and move on to something new. There's always this churn and unnecessary change because all these people they employ need to be doing something to justify being paid. The hidden dislike option may be an idea for gauging user reactions towards a particular idea or post. But the problem is that dislikes don't mean anything unless they are accompanied by verbal feedback, which, if the person wants to give, can always do so using the reply option! This would be constructive for the person who made the post! There may not be any use from the reactions (dislike) per se! 😊 @Gargron I think it means twitter wants more data to feed the algorithm which is already messing up the experience for users that are not huge celebrities. @Gargron It needlessly adds a layer of maladaptive discontent similar to Reddit, even if not overt. Boost/Fav does the maximum level of interaction that healthy communities already employ IRL as in "I like this and I'll share it with folks who know me". Blocking/Muting already does most of what dislikes intend as a whole It's pointless unless you have an algorithmic feed looking at those downvotes and using them to decide what to show to the user. I don't want an algorithmic feed though, I want a programmable feed. I'm not against downvotes that are shown to the user, but downvotes which are only shown to the robots are useless to me since I to avoid the robots manipulating my feeds. @Gargron It's awful. Twitter doesn't need to become Reddit (with its downvotes), and I wish we'd stop trying to make every social media site identical to every other one. What ever happened to distinctiveness as a draw for the user? @Gargron it’s interesting. I have a zombie Twitter account that never posts and you can really see the algorithm struggle to try to capture my eyeballs, every email I get has like 1 post from an account I follow and 4 that drive outrage. Giving people a button to express their disdain seems like a good way to optimize outrage generation. I believe a number of people responding have missed the "on replies" part... and maybe also the "hidden" part... 🏳️🌈 NSFW nudes, one might think that without dislikes, the people who dislike a tweet would reply to it with their criticism. Depending on how you look at it, it might be good — because instead of silent downvotes you're getting criticized with actual words to make sense of — or bad, because this criticism might be toxic. (are there SFW nudes?) @Gargron I don't know. It's hidden, but I'm not really seeing the need for one. Folks on Twitter have never been shy about letting others know when they dislike something. I guess, that would be easier than commenting. It's wait and see with an expectation that Twitter will badly implement this new feature. @Gargron I’m more interested in the ability to restrict who can reply to a post. Options like: |
@Gargron what's a twitter?