Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Velux ΘΔ

@ivory Any chance you’re planning to have the filters set in app match up/‘sync’/affect the filters set on server? That would be huge!

2 comments
Ivory by Tapbots :emoji_wink:

@Velux Eventually. Our keyword filters have regex support which are much better than the web ones. But we will figure out how to make them all play nicely.

Alex is catching up on sleep

@ivory @Velux another user begging for this, here! At minimum I’d love an option to “use server filters” where trying to mute something just opens a web browser to the server filters page, instead of the in-app filters.

I’m glad to have learned in another sub-thread that server side “hide completely” filters are implemented in ivory while “hide with a warning” are not (yet). This is enough to make Ivory usable for me and worth paying for, but I’d love to be able to create filters, too, without dropping out to a separate web browser.

As a user of Tweetbot for something like a decade, I had hundreds and hundreds of items on my mute list. Mastodon’s ability to group them like “US politics”, “sportsball”, “job postings” makes them far easier to manage than tweetbot’s/ivory’s grouping by users, hashtags and keywords. Scrolling to find a certain filter and modify it (as I often did when I muted someone on my main feed after adding them to a list, but needed to ensure they weren’t muted in that list) became clunkier and clunkier over time, as the lists got longer.

@ivory @Velux another user begging for this, here! At minimum I’d love an option to “use server filters” where trying to mute something just opens a web browser to the server filters page, instead of the in-app filters.

I’m glad to have learned in another sub-thread that server side “hide completely” filters are implemented in ivory while “hide with a warning” are not (yet). This is enough to make Ivory usable for me and worth paying for, but I’d love to be able to create filters, too, without dropping...

Go Up